|
|
|
church fathers 15
OUR
LORD'S SERMON ON THE MOUNT. BOOK I. EXPLANATION OF THE FIRST PART OF
THE SERMON DELIVERED BY OUR LORD ON THE MOUNT, AS CONTAINED IN THE
FIFTH CHAPTER OF MATTHEW.
|
OUR LORD'S SERMON ON THE MOUNT.
BOOK I.
EXPLANATION OF THE FIRST PART OF THE SERMON DELIVERED BY OUR LORD ON THE MOUNT, AS CONTAINED IN THE FIFTH CHAPTER OF MATTHEW.
CHAP. I.--1.
If any one will piously and soberly consider the sermon which our Lord
Jesus Christ spoke on the mount, as we read it in the Gospel according
to Matthew, I think that he will find in it, so far as regards the
highest morals, a perfect standard of the Christian life: and this we
do not rashly venture to promise, but gather it from the very words of
the Lord Himself. For the sermon itself is brought to a close in such a
way, that it is clear there are in it all the precepts which go to
mould the life. For thus He speaks: "Therefore, whosoever heareth these
words of mine, and doeth them, I will liken(1) him unto a wise man,
which built
his house upon a rock: and the rain descended, and the floods came, and
the winds blew, and beat(2) upon that house; and it fell not: for it
was founded upon a rock. And every one that heareth these words of
mine, and doeth them not, I will liken(3) unto a foolish man, which
built his house upon the sand: and the rain descended, and the floods
came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and
great was the fall of it." Since, therefore, He has not simply said,
"Whosoever heareth my words," but has made an addition, saying,
"Whosoever heareth these words of mine," He has sufficiently indicated,
as I think, that these sayings which He uttered on the mount so
perfectly guide the life of those who may be willing to live according
to them, that they may justly be compared to one building upon a rock.
I have said this merely that it may be clear that the sermon before us
is
perfect in all the precepts by which the Christian life is moulded; for
as regards this particular section a more careful treatment will be
given in its own place.(4)
2. The beginning, then, of this sermon is introduced as follows: "And
when He saw the great(1) multitudes, He went up into a mountain:(2) and
when He was set, His disciples came unto Him: and He opened His mouth,
and taught them, saying." If it is asked what the "mountain" means, it
may well be understood as meaning the greater precepts of
righteousness; for there were lesser ones which were given to the Jews.
Yet it is one God who, through His holy prophets and servants,
according to a thoroughly arranged distribution of times, gave the
lesser precepts to a people who as yet required to be bound by fear;
and who, through His Son, gave the greater ones to a people whom it had
now become suitable to set free by love. Moreover, when the lesser are
given to the lesser, and the greater to the greater, they are given by
Him who alone knows how to present to the human race the medicine
suited to the occasion. Nor is it surprising that the greater precepts
are given for the kingdom of heaven, and the lesser for an earthly
kingdom, by that one and the same God, who made heaven and earth. With
respect, therefore, to that righteousness which is the greater, it is
said through the prophet, "Thy righteousness is like the mountains of
God:"(3) and this may well mean that the one Master alone fit to teach
matters of so great importance teaches on a mountain. Then He teaches
sitting, as behooves the dignity of the instructor's office; and His
disciples come to Him, in order that they might be nearer in body for
hearing His words, as they also approached in spirit to fulfil His
precepts. "And He opened His mouth, and taught them, saying." The
circumlocution before us, which runs, "And He opened His mouth,"
perhaps gracefully intimates by the mere pause that the sermon will be
somewhat longer than usual, unless, perchance, it should not be without
meaning, that now He is said to have opened His own mouth, whereas
under the old law He was accustomed to open the mouths of the
prophets.(4)
3. What, then, does He say? "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs
is the kingdom of heaven." We read in Scripture concerning the striving
after temporal things, "All is vanity and presumption of spirit;"(5)
but presumption of spirit means audacity and pride: usually also the
proud are said to have great spirits; and rightly, inasmuch as the wind
also is called spirit. And hence it is written, "Fire, hail, snow, ice,
spirit of tempest."(6) But, indeed, who does not know that the proud
are spoken of as puffed up, as if swelled out with wind? And hence also
that expression of the apostle, "Knowledge puffeth up, but charity
edifieth."(7) And "the poor in spirit" are rightly understood here, as
meaning the humble and God-fearing, i.e. those who have not the spirit
which puffeth up. Nor ought blessedness to begin at any other point
whatever, if indeed it is to attain unto the highest
wisdom; "but the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom;"(8) for,
on the other hand also, "pride" is entitled "the beginning of all
sin."(9) Let the proud, therefore, seek after and love the kingdoms of
the earth; but "blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the
kingdom of heaven."(10)
CHAP. II.--4.
"Blessed are the meek, for they shall by inheritance possess(11) the
earth:" that earth, I suppose, of which it is said in the Psalm, "Thou
art my refuge, my portion in the land of the living."(12) For it
signifies a certain firmness and stability of the perpetual
inheritance, where the soul, by means of a good disposition, rests, as
it were, in its own place, just as the body rests on the earth, and is
nourished from it with its own food, as the body from the earth. This
is the very rest and life of the saints. Then, the meek are those who
yield to acts of wickedness, and do not resist evil, but overcome evil
with good.(13) Let
those, then, who are not meek quarrel and fight for earthly and
temporal things; but "blessed are the meek, for they shall by
inheritance possess the earth," from which they cannot be driven
out.(1)
5. "Blessed are they that mourn:(2) for they shall be comforted."
Mourning is sorrow arising from the loss of things held dear; but those
who are converted to God lose those things which they were accustomed
to embrace as dear in this world: for they do not rejoice in those
things in which they formerly rejoiced; and until the love of eternal
things be in them, they are wounded by some measure of grief. Therefore
they will be comforted by the Holy Spirit, who on this account chiefly
is called the Paraclete, i.e. the Comforter, in order that, while
losing the temporal joy, they may enjoy to the full that which is
eternal.(3)
6. "Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness:
for they shall be filled." Now He calls those parties, lovers of a true
and indestructible good. They will therefore be filled with that food
of which the Lord Himself says, "My meat is to do the will of my
Father," which is righteousness; and with that water, of which
whosoever "drinketh," as he also says, it "shall be in him a well of
water, springing up into everlasting life."(4)
7. "Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy."(5) He says
that they are blessed who relieve the miserable, for it is paid back to
them in such a way that they are freed from misery.
8. "Blessed are the pure in heart:(6) for they shall see God." How
foolish, therefore, are those who seek God with these outward eyes,
since He is seen with the heart! as it is written elsewhere, "And in
singleness of heart seek Him."(7) For that is a pure heart which is a
single heart: and just as this light cannot be seen, except with pure
eyes; so neither is God seen, unless that is pure by which He can be
seen.(8)
9. "Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children
of God." It is the perfection of peace, where nothing offers
opposition; and the children of God are peacemakers, because nothing
resists God, and surely children ought to have the likeness of their
father. Now, they are peacemakers in themselves who, by bringing in
order all the motions of their soul, and subjecting them to
reason--i.e. to the mind and spirit--and by having their carnal lusts
thoroughly subdued, become a kingdom of God: in which all things are so
arranged, that that which is chief and pre-eminent in man rules without
resistance over the other elements, which are common to us with the
beasts; and that very element which is pre-eminent in man, i.e. mind
and reason, is brought under subjection to something better still,
which is the truth itself, the only-begotten Son of God. For a man is
not able
to rule over things which are inferior, unless he subjects himself to
what is superior. And this is the peace which is given on earth to men
of goodwill;(9) this the life of the fully developed and perfect wise
man. From a kingdom of this sort brought to a condition of thorough
peace and order, the prince of this world is cast out, who rules where
there is perversity and disorder.(10) When this peace has been inwardly
established and confirmed, whatever persecutions he who has been east
out shall stir up from without, he only increases the glory which is
according to God; being unable to shake anything in that edifice, but
by the failure of his machinations making it to be known with how great
strength it has been built from within outwardly. Hence there follows:
"Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for
theirs is the kingdom of heaven."
CHAP. III.--10.
There are in all, then, these eight sentences. For now in what remains
He speaks in the way of direct address to those who were present,
saying: "Blessed shall ye be when men shall revile you and persecute
you." But the former sentences He addressed in a general way: for He
did not say, Blessed are ye poor in spirit, for yours is the kingdom of
heaven; but He says, "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the
kingdom of heaven:" nor, Blessed are ye meek, for ye shall inherit the
earth; but, "Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth."
And so the others up to the eighth sentence, where He says: "Blessed
are they
which are persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom
of heaven." After that He now begins to speak in the way of direct
address to those present, although what has been said before referred
also to His present audience; and that which follows, and which seems
to be spoken specially to those present, refers also to those who were
absent, or who would afterwards come into existence.
For this reason the number of sentences before us is to be carefully
considered. For the beatitudes begin with humility: "Blessed are the
poor in spirit," i.e. those not puffed up, while the soul submits
itself to divine authority, fearing lest after this life it go away to
punishment, although perhaps in this life it might seem to itself to be
happy. Then it (the soul) comes to the knowledge of the divine
Scriptures, where it must show itself meek in its piety, lest it should
venture to condemn that which seems absurd to the unlearned, and should
itself be rendered unteachable by obstinate disputations. After that,
it now begins to know in what entanglements of this world it is held by
reason of carnal custom and sins: and so in this third stage, in which
there is knowledge, the loss of the highest good is mourned over,
because it sticks fast in what is lowest. Then, in the fourth
stage there is labour, where vehement exertion is put forth, in order
that the mind may wrench itself away from those things in which, by
reason of their pestilential sweetness, it is entangled: here therefore
righteousness is hungered and thirsted after, and fortitude is very
necessary; because what is retained with delight is not abandoned
without pain. Then, at the fifth stage, to those persevering in labour,
counsel for getting rid of it is given; for unless each one is assisted
by a superior, in no way is he fit in his own case to extricate himself
from so great entanglements of miseries. But it is a just counsel, that
he who wishes to be assisted by a stronger should assist him who is
weaker in that in which he himself is stronger: therefore "blessed are
the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy." At the sixth stage there is
purity of heart, able from a good conscience of good
works to contemplate that, highest good, which can be discerned by the
pure and tranquil intellect alone. Lastly is the seventh, wisdom
itself--i.e. the contemplation of the truth, tranquillizing the whole
man, and assuming the likeness of God, which is thus summed up:
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of
God." The eighth, as it were, returns to the starting-point, because it
shows and commends what is complete and perfect:(1) therefore in the
first and in the eighth the kingdom of heaven is named, "Blessed are
the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven;" and, "Blessed
are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is
the kingdom of heaven:" as it is now said, "Who shall separate us from
the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or
famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?"(2) Seven in number,
therefore, are the things which bring perfection: for the eighth brings
into light and shows what is perfect, so that starting, as it were,
from the beginning again, the others also are perfected by means of
these stages.
CHAP. IV.--11.
Hence also the sevenfold operation of the Holy Ghost, of which Isaiah
speaks,(3) seems to me to correspond to these stages and sentences. But
there is a difference of order: for there the enumeration begins with
the more excellent, but here with the inferior. For there it begins
with wisdom, and closes with the fear of God: but "the fear of the Lord
is the beginning of wisdom." And therefore, if we reckon as it were in
a gradually ascending series, there the fear of God is first, piety
second, knowledge third, fortitude fourth, counsel fifth, understanding
sixth, wisdom seventh. The fear of God corresponds to the humble, of
whom
it is here said, "Blessed are the poor in spirit," i.e. those not
puffed up, not proud: to whom the apostle says, "Be not high-minded,
but fear;"(4) i.e. be not lifted up. Piety(5) corresponds to the meek:
for he who inquires piously honours Holy Scripture, and does not
censure what he does not yet understand, and on this account does not
offer resistance; and this is to be meek: whence it is here said,
"Blessed are the meek." Knowledge corresponds to those that mourn who
already have found out in the Scriptures by what evils they are held
chained which they ignorantly have coveted as though they were good and
useful. Fortitude corresponds to those hungering and thirsting: for
they labour in earnestly desiring joy from things that are truly good,
and in eagerly seeking to turn away their love from earthly and
corporeal things: and of them it is here said, "Blessed are they which
do
hunger and thirst after righteousness." Counsel corresponds to the
merciful: for this is the one remedy for escaping from so great evils,
that we forgive, as we wish to be ourselves forgiven; and that we
assist others so far as we are able, as we ourselves desire to be
assisted where we are not able: and of them it is here said, "Blessed
are the merciful." Understanding corresponds to the pure in heart, the
eye being as it were purged, by which that may be beheld which eye hath
not seen, nor ear heard, and what hath not entered into the heart of
man:(1) and of them it is here said," Blessed are the pure in heart."
Wisdom corresponds to the peacemakers, in whom all things are now
brought into order, and no passion is in a state of rebellion against
reason, but all things together obey the spirit of man, while he
himself also obeys God: and of them it is here said, "Blessed are the
peacemakers.''(2)
12. Moreover, the one reward, which is the kingdom of heaven, is
variously named according to these stages. In the first, just as ought
to be the case, is placed the kingdom of heaven, which is the perfect
and highest wisdom of the rational soul. Thus, therefore, it is said,
"Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven:"
as if it were said, "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom."
To the meek an inheritance is given, as it were the testament of a
father to those dutifully seeking it: "Blessed are the meek, for they
shall inherit the earth." To the mourners comfort, as to those who know
what they have lost, and in what evils they are sunk: "Blessed are they
that mourn, for they shall be comforted." To those hungering and
thirsting, a full supply, as it were a refreshment to those labouring
and bravely contending for salvation: "Blessed are they which
do hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled." To
the merciful mercy, as to those following a true and excellent counsel,
so that this same treatment is extended toward them by one who is
stronger, which they extend toward the weaker: "Blessed are the
merciful, for they shall obtain mercy." To the pure in heart is given
the power of seeing God, as to those bearing about with them a pure eye
for discerning eternal things: "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they
shall see God." To the peacemakers the likeness of God is given, as
being perfectly wise, and formed after the image of God by means of the
regeneration of the renewed man: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they
shall be called the children of God." And those promises can indeed be
fulfilled in this life, as we believe them to have been fulfilled in
the case of the apostles. For that all-embracing change
into the angelic form, which is promised after this life, cannot be
explained in any words. "Blessed," therefore, "are they which are
persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of
heaven." This eighth sentence, which goes back to the starting-point,
and makes manifest the perfect man, is perhaps set forth in its meaning
both by the circumcision on the eighth day in the Old Testament, and by
the resurrection of the Lord after the Sabbath, the day which is
certainly the eighth, and at the same time the first day; and by the
celebration of the eight festival days which we celebrate in the case
of the regeneration of the new man; and by the very number of
Pentecost. For to the number seven, seven times multiplied, by which we
make forty-nine, as it were an eighth is added, so that fifty may be
made up, and we, as it were, return to the starting-point: on which day
the Holy
Spirit was sent, by whom we are led into the kingdom of heaven, and
receive the inheritance, and are comforted; and are fed, and obtain
mercy, and are purified, and are made peacemakers; and being thus
perfect, we bear all troubles brought upon us from without for the sake
of truth and righteousness.
CHAP. V.--13.
"Blessed are ye," says He, "when men shall revile you, and persecute
you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely for my sake.
Rejoice and be exceeding glad: for great(3) is your reward in heaven."
Let any one who is seeking after the delights of this world and the
riches of temporal things under the Christian name, consider that our
blessedness, is within; as it is said of the soul of the Church(4) by
the mouth of the prophet, "All the beauty of the king's daughter is
within;"(5) for outwardly revilings, and persecutions, and
disparagements are promised; and yet, from these things there is a
great reward in heaven,
which is felt in the heart of those who endure, those who can now say,
"We glory in tribulations: knowing that tribulation worketh patience;
and patience, experience; and experience, hope: and hope maketh not
ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the
Holy Ghost which is given unto us."(6) For it is not simply the
enduring of such things that is advantageous, but the bearing of such
things for the name of Christ not only with tranquil mind, but even
with exultation. For many heretics, deceiving souls under the Christian
name, endure many such things; but they are excluded from that reward
on this account, that it is not said merely, "Blessed are they which
endure persecution;" but it is added," for righteousness' sake." Now,
where there is no sound faith, there can be no righteousness, for the
just [righteous] man lives by faith.(7) Neither let schismatics
promise themselves anything of that reward; for similarly, where there
is no love, there cannot be righteousness, for "love worketh no ill to
his neighbour;"(1) and if they had it, they would not tear in pieces
Christ's body, which is the Church.(2)
14. But it may be asked, What is the difference when He says, "when men
shall revile you," and "when they shall say all manner of evil against
you," since to revile(3) is just this, to say evil against?(4) But it
is one thing when the reviling word is hurled with contumely in
presence of him who is reviled, as it was said to our Lord, "Say we not
the truth(5) that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil?"(6) and
another thing, when our reputation is injured in our absence, as it is
also written of Him, "Some said, He is a prophet;(7) others said, Nay,
but He deceiveth the people."(8) Then, further, to persecute is to
inflict violence, or to assail with snares, as was done by him who
betrayed Him, and by them who crucified Him. Certainly, as for the fact
that this also is not put in a bare form, so that it should be said,
"and shall say all manner of evil against you," but there is
added the word "falsely," and also the expression "for my sake;" I
think that the addition is made for the sake of those who wish to glory
in persecutions, and in the baseness of their reputation; and to say
that Christ belongs to them for this reason, that many bad things are
said about them; while, on the one hand, the things said are true, when
they are said respecting their error; and, on the other hand, if
sometimes also some false charges are thrown out, which frequently
happens from the rashness of men, yet they do not suffer such things
for Christ's sake.(9) For he is not a follower of Christ who is not
called a Christian according to the true faith and the catholic
discipline.
15. "Rejoice," says He, "and be exceeding glad: for great is your
reward in heaven." I do not think that it is the higher parts of this
visible world that are here called heaven. For our reward, which ought
to be immoveable and eternal, is not to be placed in things fleeting
and temporal. But I think the expression "in heaven" means in the
spiritual firmament, where dwells everlasting righteousness: in
comparison with which a Wicked soul is called earth, to which it is
said when it sins," Earth thou art, and unto earth thou shalt
return."(10) Of this heaven the apostle says, "For our conversation is
in heaven."(11) Hence they who rejoice in spiritual good are conscious
of that reward now; but then it will be perfected in every part, when
this mortal also shall have put on immortality. "For," says He, "so
persecuted they the prophets also which were before you." In the
present case He
has used "persecution" in a general sense, as applying alike to abusive
words and to the tearing in pieces of one's reputation; and has well
encouraged them by an example, because they who speak true things are
wont to suffer persecution: nevertheless did not the ancient prophets
on this account, through fear of persecution, give over the preaching
of the truth.
CHAP. VI.--16.
Hence there follows most justly the statement, "Ye are the salt of the
earth;" showing that those parties are to be judged insipid, who,
either in the eager pursuit after abundance of earthly blessings, or
through the dread of want, lose the eternal things which can neither be
given nor taken away by men. "But(12) if the salt have lost(13) its
savour, wherewith shall it be salted?" i.e., If ye, by means of whom
the nations in a measure are to be preserved [from corruption], through
the dread of temporal persecutions shall lose the kingdom of heaven,
where will be the men through whom error may be removed from you, since
God has
chosen you, in order that through you He might remove the error of
others? Hence the savourless salt is "good for nothing, but to be cast
out, and trodden under foot of men." It is not therefore he who suffers
persecution, but he who is rendered savourless by the fear of
persecution, that is trodden under foot of men. For it is only one who
is undermost that can be trodden under foot; but he is not undermost,
who, however many things he may suffer in his body on the earth, yet
has his heart fixed in heaven.(14)
17. "Ye are the light(15) of the world." In the same way as He said
above, "the salt of the earth," so now He says, "the light of the
world." For in the former case that earth is not to be understood which
we tread with our bodily feet, but the men who dwell upon the earth, or
even the sinners, for the preserving of whom and for the extinguishing
of whose corruptions the Lord sent the apostolic salt. And here, by the
world must be understood not the heavens and the earth, but the men who
are in the world or love the world, for the enlightening of whom the
apostles were sent.[1] "A city that is set on[2]an hill cannot be hid,"
i.e. [a city] founded upon great and distinguished righteousness, which
is also the meaning of the mountain itself on which our Lord is
discoursing. "Neither do men light a candle[3] and put it under a
bushel measure."[4] What view are we to take? That the
expression "under a bushel measure" is so used that only the
concealment of the candle is to be understood, as if He were saying, No
one lights a candle and conceals it? Or does the bushel measure also
mean something, so that to place a candle under a bushel is this, to
place the comforts of the body higher than the preaching of the truth;
so that one does not preach the truth so long as he is afraid of
suffering any annoyance in corporeal and temporal things ? And it is
well said a bushel measure, whether on account of the recompense of
measure, for each one receives the things done in his body,--"that
every one," says the apostle, "may there receive s the things done in
his body;" and it is said in another place, as if of this bushel
measure of the body, "For with what measure ye mete, it shall be
measured to you again: "[6]--or because temporal good things, which are
carried to
completion in the body, are both begun and come to an end in a certain
definite number of days, which is perhaps meant by the "bushel
measure;" while eternal and spiritual things are confined within no
such limit, "for God giveth not the Spirit by measure."[7] Every one,
therefore, who obscures and covers up the light of good doctrine by
means of temporal comforts, places his candle under a bushel measure.
"But on a candlestick."[8] Now it is placed on a candlestick by him who
subordinates his body to the service of God, so that the preaching of
the truth is the higher, and the serving of the body the lower; yet by
means even of the service of the body the doctrine shines more
conspicuously, inasmuch as it is insinuated into those who learn by
means of bodily functions, i.e. by means of the voice and tongue, and
the other movements of the body in good works. The apostle therefore
puts
his candle on a candlestick, when he says, "So fight I, not as one that
beateth[9] the air; but I keep under my body, and bring it into
subjection, lest that by any means, when I preach to others, I myself
should be found a castaway."[10] When He says, however, "that it may
give light to all who are in the house," I am of opinion that it is the
abode of men which is called a house, i.e. the world itself, on account
of what He says before, "Ye are the light of the world;" or if any one
chooses to understand the house as being the Church, this, too, is not
out of place.
CHAP. VII.--18.
"Let your light,"[11] says He, "so shine before men, that they may see
your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven." If He had
merely said, "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see
your good works," He would seem to have fixed an end in the praises of
men, which hypocrites seek, and those who canvass for honours and covet
glory of the emptiest kind. Against such parties it is said, "If I yet
pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ;"[12] and, by the
prophet, "They who please men are put to shame, because God hath
despised them;" and again, "God hath broken the bones of those who
please
men;"[13] and again the apostle, "Let us not be desirous of
vainglory;"[14] and still another time, "But let every man prove his
own work, and then shall he have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in
another."[15] Hence our Lord has not said merely, "that they may see
your good works," but has added, "and glorify your Father who is in
heaven:" so that the mere fact that a man by means of good works
pleases men, does not there set it up as an end that he should please
men; but let him subordinate this to the praise of God, and for this
reason please men, that God may be glorified in him. For this is
expedient for them who offer praise, that they should honour, not man,
but God; as our Lord showed in the case of the man who was carried,
where, on the paralytic being healed, the multitude, marvelling at His
powers, as it is written in the Gospel, "feared and glorified God,
which had given
such power unto men."[16] And His imitator, the Apostle Paul, says,
"But they had heard only, that he which persecuted us in times past now
preacheth the faith which once he destroyed; and they glorified[1] God
in me."
19. And therefore, after He has exhorted His hearers that they should
prepare themselves to bear all things for truth and righteousness, and
that they should not hide the good which they were about to receive,
but should learn with such benevolence as to teach others, aiming in
their good works not at their own praise, but at the glory of God, He
begins now to inform and to teach them what they are to teach; as if
they were asking Him, saying: Lo, we are willing both to bear all
things for Thy name, and not to hide Thy doctrine; but what precisely
is this which Thou forbiddest us to hide, and for which Thou commandest
us to bear all things ? Art Thou about to mention other things contrary
to those which are written in the law ? "No," says He; "for think not
that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to
destroy, but to fulfil."
CHAP. VIII.--20.
In this sentence the meaning is twofold.[2] We must deal with it in
both ways. For He who says, "I am not come[3] to destroy the law, but
to fulfil," means it either in the way of adding what is wanting, or of
doing what is in it. Let us then consider that first which I have put
first: for he who adds what is wanting does not surely destroy what he
finds, but rather confirms it by perfecting it; and accordingly He
follows up with the statement, "Verily I say unto you,[4] Till heaven
and earth pass, one iota or one tittle shall in nowise pass from the
law, till all be fulfilled." For, if even those things which are added
for
completion are fulfilled, much more are those things fulfilled which
are sent in advance as a commencement. Then, as to what He says, "One
iota or one tittle shall in nowise pass from the law," nothing else can
be understood but a strong expression of perfection, since it is
pointed out by means of single letters, among which letters "iota" is
smaller than the others, for it is made by a single stroke; while a
"tittle" is but a particle of some sort at the top of even that. And by
these words He shows that in the law all the smallest particulars even
are to be carried into effect.[5] After that He subjoins: "Whosoever,
therefore, shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach
men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven." Hence
it is the least commandments that are meant by "one iota" and "one
tittle." And therefore, "whosoever shall break and shall teach
[men] so,"--i.e. in accordance with what he breaks, not in accordance
with what he finds and reads,--"shall be called the least in the
kingdom of heaven;" and therefore, perhaps, he will not be in the
kingdom of heaven at all, where only the great can be. "But whosoever
shall do and teach [men] so,"[6]--i.e. who shall not break, and shall
teach men so, in accordance with what he does not break,--"shall be
called great in the kingdom of heaven." But in regard to him who shall
be called great in the kingdom of heaven, it follows that he is also in
the kingdom of heaven, into which the great are admitted: for to this
what follows refers.
CHAP. IX.--21.
"For I say unto you, that except your righteousness shall exceed the
righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter
into the kingdom of heaven;"[7] i.e., unless ye shall fulfil not only
those least precepts of the law which begin the man, but also those
which are added by me, who am not come to destroy the law, but to
fulfil it, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. But you say
to me: If, when He was speaking above of those least commandments, He
said that whosoever shall break one of them, and shall teach in
accordance with his transgression, is called the least in the kingdom
of heaven; but that
whosoever shall do them, and shall teach [men] so, is called great, and
hence will be already in the kingdom of heaven, because he is great:
what need is there for additions to the least precepts of the law, if
he can be already in the kingdom of heaven, because whosoever shall do
them, and shall so teach, is great ? For this reason that sentence is
to be understood thus: "But whosoever shall do and teach men so, the
same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven,"--i.e. not in
accordance with those least commandments, but in accordance with those
which I am about to mention. Now what are they? "That your
righteousness," says He, "may exceed that of the scribes and
Pharisees;" for unless it shall exceed theirs, ye shall not enter into
the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever, therefore, shall break those least
commandments, and shall teach men so, shall be called the least; but
whosoever
shall do those least commandments, and shall teach men so, is not
necessarily to be reckoned great and meet for the kingdom of heaven;
but yet he is not so much the least as the man who breaks them. But in
order that he may be great and fit for that kingdom, he ought to do and
teach as Christ now teaches, i.e. in order that his righteousness may
exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees. The righteousness of the
Pharisees is, that they shall not kill; the righteousness of those who
are destined to enter into the kingdom of God, that they be not angry
without a cause. The least commandment, therefore, is not to kill; and
whosoever shall break that, shall be called least in the kingdom of
heaven; but whosoever shall fulfil that commandment not to kill, will
not, as a necessary consequence, be great and meet for the kingdom of
heaven, but yet he ascends a certain step. He will be perfected,
however, if he be not angry without a cause; and if he shall do this,
he will be much further removed from murder. For this reason he who
teaches that we should not be angry, does not break the law not to
kill, but rather fulfils it; so that we preserve our innocence both
outwardly when we do not kill, and in heart when we are not angry.
22. "Ye have heard" therefore, says He, "that it was said to them of
old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in
danger of the judgment. But I say unto you, that whosoever is angry
with his brother without a cause[1] shall be in danger of the judgment:
and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the
council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of the
gehenna of fire." What is the difference between being in danger of the
judgment, and being in danger of the council, and being in danger of
the gehenna of fire?[2] For this last sounds most weighty, and reminds
us that certain stages were passed over from lighter to more weighty,
until the gehenna of fire was reached. And, therefore, if it is a
lighter thing to be in danger of the judgment than to be in danger of
the council, and if it is also a lighter thing to be in
danger of the council than to be in danger of the gehenna of fire, we
must understand it to be a lighter thing to be angry with a brother
without a cause than to say" Raca;" and again, to be a lighter thing to
say "Raca" than to say "Thou fool." For the danger would not have
gradations, unless the sins also were mentioned in gradation.
23. But here one obscure word has found a place, for "Raca" is neither
Latin nor Greek. The others, however, are current in our language. Now,
some have wished to derive the interpretation of this expression from
the Greek, supposing that a ragged person is called "Raca," because a
rag is called in Greek <greek>rakos</greek>; yet, when one
asks them what a ragged person is called in Greek, they do not answer
"Rata;" and further, the Latin translator might have put the word
ragged where he has placed "Raca," and not have used a word which, on
the one hand, has no existence in the Latin language, and, on the
other, is rare in the Greek. Hence the view is more probable which I
heard from a certain Hebrew whom I had asked about it; for he said that
the word does not mean anything, but merely expresses the emotion of an
angry hind. Grammarians call those particles of speech
which express an affection of an agitated mind interjections; as when
it is said by one who is grieved, "Alas," or by one who is angry,
"Hah." And these words in all languages are proper names, and are not
easily translated into another language; and this cause certainly
compelled alike the Greek and the Latin translators to put the word
itself, inasmuch as they could find no way of translating it.[3]
24. There is therefore a gradation in the sins referred to, so that
first one is angry, and keeps that feeling as a conception in his
heart; but if now that emotion shall draw forth an expression of anger
not having any definite meaning, but giving evidence of that feeling of
the mind by the very fact of the outbreak wherewith he is assailed with
whom one is angry, this is certainly more than if the rising anger were
restrained by silence; but if there is heard not merely an expression
of anger, but also a word by which the party using it now indicates and
signifies a distinct censure of him against whom it is directed, who
doubts but that this is something more than if merely an exclamation of
anger were uttered? Hence in the first there is one thing, i.e. anger
alone; in the second two things, both anger and a word that expresses
anger; in the third three things, anger and a word
that expresses anger, and in that word the utterance of distinct
censure. Look now also at the three degrees of liability,--the
judgment, the council, the gehenna of fire. For in the judgment an
opportunity is still given for defence; in the council, however,
although there is also wont to be a judgment, yet because the very
distinction compels us to acknowledge that there is a certain
difference in this place, the production of the sentence seems to
belong to the council, inasmuch as it is not now the case of the
accused himself that is in question, whether he is to be condemned or
not, but they who judge confer with one another to what punishment they
ought to condemn him, who, it is clear, is to be condemned; but the
gehenna of fire does not treat as a doubtful matter either the
condemnation, like the judgment, or the punishment of him who is
condemned, like the council; for in the
gehenna of fire both the condemnation and the punishment of him who is
condemned are certain. Thus there are seen certain degrees in the sins
and in the liability to punishment;[1] but who can tell in what ways
they are invisibly shown in the punishments of souls ? We are therefore
to learn how great the difference is between the righteousness of the
Pharisees and that greater righteousness which introduces into the
kingdom of heaven, because while it is a more serious crime to kill
than to inflict reproach by means of a word, in the one case killing
exposes one to the judgment, but in the other anger exposes one to the
judgment, which is the least of those three sins; for in the former
case they were discussing the question of murder among men, but in the
latter all things are disposed of by means of a divine judgment, where
the end of the condemned is the gehenna of fire. But whoever
shall say that murder is punished by a more severe penalty under the
greater righteousness if a reproach is punished by the gehenna of fire,
compels us to understand that there are differences of gehennas.
25. Indeed, in the three statements before us, we must observe that
some words are understood. For the first statement has all the words
that are necessary. "Whosoever," says He, "is angry with his brother
without a cause, shall be in danger of the judgment." But in the:
second, when He says, "and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca,"
there is understood the expression without cause,[2] and thus there is
subjoined, "shall be in danger of the council." In the third, now,
where He says, "but whosoever shall say, Thou fool," two things are
understood, both to his brother and without cause. And in this way we
defend the apostle when he calls the Galatians fools,[3] to whom he
also gives, the name of brethren; for he does not do it without cause.
And here the word brother is to be understood for this reason, that the
case of an enemy is spoken of afterwards, and how he also is to be
treated under the greater righteousness.
CHAP. X.--26.
Next there follows here: "Therefore, if thou hast brought[4] thy gift
to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against
thee; leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first be
reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift." From this
surely it is clear that what is aid above is said of a brother:
inasmuch as the sentence which follows is connected by such a
conjunction that it confirms the preceding one; for He does not say,
But if thou bring thy gift to the altar; but He says, "Therefore, if
thou bring thy gift to the altar." For if it is not lawful to be angry
with one's brother
without a cause, or to say "Raca," or to say" Thou fool," much less is
it lawful so to retain anything in one's mind, as that indignation may
be turned into hatred. And to this belongs also what is said in another
passage: "Let not the sun go down upon your wrath."[5] We are therefore
commanded, when about to bring our gift to the altar, if we remember
that our brother hath ought against us, to leave the gift before the
altar, and to go and be reconciled to our brother, and then to come and
offer the gift.[6] But if this is to be understood literally, one might
perhaps suppose that such a thing ought to be done if the brother is
present; for it cannot be delayed too long, since you are commanded to
leave your gift before the altar. If, therefore, such a thing should
come into your mind respecting one who is absent, and, as may happen,
even settled down beyond the sea, it is absurd to
suppose that your gift is to be left before the altar until you may
offer it to God after having traversed both lands and seas. And
therefore we are compelled to have recourse to an altogether internal
and spiritual interpretation, in order that what has been said may be
understood without absurdity.
27. And so we may interpret the altar spiritually, as being faith
itself in the inner temple of God, whose emblem is the visible altar.
For whatever offering we present to God, whether prophecy, or teaching,
or prayer, or a psalm, or a hymn, and whatever other such like
spiritual gift occurs to the mind, it cannot be acceptable to God,
unless it be sustained by sincerity of faith, and, as it were, placed
on that fixedly and immoveably, so that what we utter may remain whole
and uninjured. For many heretics, not having the altar, i.e. true
faith, have spoken blasphemies for praise; being weighed down, to wit,
with earthly opinions, and thus, as it were, throwing down their
offering on the ground. But there ought also to be purity of intention
on the part of the offerer. And therefore, when we are about to present
any such offering in our heart, i.e. in the inner temple of God ("For,"
as it is said, "the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are; "[1]
and, "That Christ may dwell in the inner man[2] by faith in your
hearts") if it occur to our mind that a brother hath ought against us,
i.e. if we have injured him in anything (for then he has something
against us whereas we have something against him if he has injured us,
and in that case it is not necessary to proceed to reconciliation: for
you will not ask pardon of one who has done you an injury, but merely
forgive him, as you desire to be forgiven by the Lord what you have
committed against Him), we are therefore to proceed to reconciliation,
when it has occurred to our mind that we have perhaps injured our
brother in something; but this is to be done not with the bodily feet,
but with the emotions of the mind, so that you are to prostrate
yourself with humble disposition before your brother, to whom you have
hastened in affectionate thought, in the presence of Him to whom you
are about to present your offering. For thus, even if he should be
present, you will be able to soften him by a mind free from
dissimulation, and to recall him to goodwill by asking pardon, if first
you have done this before God, going to him not with the slow movement
of the body, but with the very swift impulse of love; and then coming,
i.e. recalling your attention to that which you were beginning to do,
you will offer your gift.[3]
28. But who acts in a way that he is neither angry with his brother
without a cause, nor says "Raca" without a cause, nor calls him a fool
without a cause, all of which are most proudly committed; or so, that,
if perchance he has fallen into any of these, he asks pardon with
suppliant mind, which is the only remedy; who but just the man that is
not puffed up with the spirit of empty boasting? "Blessed" therefore
"are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." Let us
look now at what follows.
CHAP. XI.--29.
"Be kindly disposed,"[4] says he, "toward thine adversary quickly,
whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary
deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer,
and thou be cast into prison. Verily I say unto thee, thou shalt by no
means come Out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing." I
understand who the judge is: "For the Father judgeth no man, but hath
committed all judgment unto the Son."[5] I understand who the officer
is: "And angels," it is said, "ministered unto Him:"[6] and we believe
that He will come with His angels to judge the quick and the dead. I
understand
what is meant by the prison: evidently the punishments of darkness,
which He calls in another passage the outer darkness:[7] for this
reason, I believe, that the joy of the divine rewards is something
internal in the mind itself, or even if anything more hidden can be
thought of, that joy of which it is said to the servant who deserved
well, "Enter thou into the joy of thy Lord;"[8] just as also, under
this republican government, one who is thrust into prison is sent out
from the council chamber, or from the palace of the judge.
30. But now, with respect to paying the uttermost farthing,[9] it may
be understood without absurdity either as standing for this, that
nothing is left unpunished; just as in common speech we also say "to
the very dregs," when we wish to express that something is so drained
out that nothing is left: or by the expression "the uttermost farthing"
earthly sins may be meant. For as a fourth part of the separate
component parts of this world, and in fact as the last, the earth is
found; so that you begin with the heavens, you reckon the air the
second, water the third, the earth the fourth. It may therefore seem to
be suitably said, "till thou hast paid the last fourth," in the sense
of "till thou hast expiated thy earthly sins:" for this the sinner also
heard, "Earth thou art, and unto earth shall thou return."[10] Then, as
to the expression "till thou hast paid," I wonder if it does not
mean that punishment which is called eternal.[11] For whence is that
debt paid where there is now no opportunity given of repenting and of
leading a more correct life? For perhaps the expression "till thou hast
paid" stands here in the same sense as in that passage where it is
said, "Sit Thou at my right hand, until I make Thine enemies Thy
footstool;"[1] for not even when the enemies have been put under His
feet, will He cease to sit at the right hand: or that statement of the
apostle, "For He must reign, till He hath put all enemies under His
feet;"[2] for not even when they have been put under His feet, will He
cease to reign. Hence, as it is there understood of Him respecting whom
it is said, "He must reign, till He hath put His enemies under His
feet" that He will reign for ever, inasmuch as they will be for ever
under His feet: so here it may be understood of him respecting whom it
is said, "Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid
the uttermost farthing," that he will never come out; for he is always
paying the uttermost farthing, so long as he is suffering the
everlasting punishment of his earthly sins. Nor would I say this in
such a way as that I should seem to prevent a more careful discussion
respecting the punishment of sins, as to how in the Scriptures it is
called eternal; although in all possible ways it is to be avoided
rather than known.
31. But let us now see who the adversary himself is, with whom we are
enjoined to agree quickly, whiles we are in the way with him. For he is
either the devil, or a man, or the flesh, or God, or His
commandment.[3] But I do not see how we should be enjoined to be on
terms of goodwill, i.e. to be of one heart or of one mind, with the
devil. For some have rendered the Greek word which is found here "of
one heart," others "of one mind:" but neither are we enjoined to show
goodwill to the devil (for where there is goodwill there is friendship:
and no one would say that we are to make friends with the devil); nor
is it expedient to come to! an agreement with him, against whom we have
declared war by once for all renouncing him, and on conquering whom we
shall be crowned; nor ought we now to yield to him, for if we had never
yielded to him, we should never have fallen into such miseries.
Again, as to the adversary being a man, although we are enjoined to
live peaceably with all men, as far as lieth in us, where certainly
goodwill, and concord, and consent may be understood; yet I do not see
how I can accept the view, that we are delivered to the judge by a man,
in a case where I understand Christ to be the judge, "before" whose
"judgment-seat we must all appear,"[4] as the apostle says: how then is
he to deliver me to the judge, who will appear equally with me before
the judge? Or if any one is delivered to the judge because he has
injured a man, although the party who has been injured does not deliver
him, it is a much more suitable view, that the guilty party is
delivered to the judge by that law against which he acted when he
injured the man. And this for the additional reason, that if any one
has injured a man by killing him, there will be no time now in which to
agree with him; for he is not now in the way with him, i.e. in this
life: and yet a remedy will not on that account be excluded, if one
repents and flees for refuge with the sacrifice of a broken heart to
the mercy of Him who forgives the sins of those who turn to Him, and
who rejoices more over one penitent than over ninety-nine just
persons.[5] But much less do I see how we are enjoined to bear goodwill
towards, or to agree with, or to yield to, the flesh. For it is sinners
rather who love their flesh, and agree with it, and yield to it; but
those who bring it into subjection are not the parties who yield to it,
but rather they compel it to yield to them.
32. Perhaps, therefore, we are enjoined to yield to God, and to be
well-disposed towards Him, in order that we may be reconciled to Him,
from whom by sinning we have turned away, so that He can be called our
adversary. For He is rightly called the adversary of those whom He
resists, for "God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace to the
humble;"[6] and "pride is the beginning of all sin, but the beginning
of man's pride is to become apostate from God;"[7] and the apostle
says, "For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the
death of His Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by His
life."[8] And from this it may be perceived that no nature [as being]
bad is an enemy to God, inasmuch as the very parties who were enemies
are being reconciled. Whoever, therefore, while in this way, i.e. in
this life, shall not have been reconciled to God by the death of His
Son, will be delivered to the judge by Him, for "the Father judgeth no
man, but hath delivered all judgment to the Son;" and so the other
things which are described in this section follow, which we have
already discussed. There is only one thing which creates a difficulty
as regards this interpretation, viz. how it can be rightly said that we
are in the way with God, if in this passage. He Himself is to be
understood as the adversary of the wicked, with whom we are enjoined to
be reconciled quickly; unless, perchance, because He is everywhere, we
also, while we are in this way, are certainly with Him. For as it is
said, "If I ascend up into heaven, Thou art there; if I make my bed in
hell, behold, Thou art there. If I take the wings of the morning, and
dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea; even there shall Thy hand lead
me, and Thy right hand shall hold me."[1] Or if the view is not
accepted, that the wicked are said to be with God, although there is
nowhere where God is not present,--just as we do not say that the blind
are with the light, although the light surrounds their eyes,--there is
one resource remaining: that we should understand the adversary here as
being the commandment of God. For what is so much an adversary to those
who wish to sin as the commandment of God, i.e. His law and divine
Scripture, which has been given us for this life, that it may be with
us in the way, which we must not contradict, lest it deliver us to the
judge, but which we ought to submit to quickly ? For no one knows when
he may depart out of this life. Now, who is it that submits to divine
Scripture, save he who reads or hears it piously, deferring to it as of
supreme authority; so that what he understands he does not hate on this
account, that he feels it to be opposed to his
sins, but rather loves being reproved by it, and rejoices that his
maladies are not spared until they are healed; and so that even in
respect to what seems to him obscure or absurd, he does not therefore
raise contentious contradictions, but prays that he may understand, yet
remembering that goodwill and reverence are to be manifested towards so
great an authority? But who does this, unless just the man who has
come, not harshly threatening, but in the meekness of piety, for the
purpose of opening and ascertaining the contents of his father's will ?
"Blessed," therefore, "are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth."
Let us see what follows.
CHAP. XII.--33.
"Ye have heard that it was said to them of old time, Thou shalt not
commit adultery: but I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman
to lust after her, hath committed adultery with her already in his
heart." The lesser righteousness, therefore, is not to commit adultery
by carnal connection; but the greater righteousness of the kingdom of
God is not to commit adultery in the heart. Now, the man who does not
commit adultery in the heart, much more easily guards against
committing adultery in actual fact. Hence He who gave the later precept
confirmed the earlier; for He came not to destroy the law, but to
fulfil it. It is
well worthy of consideration that He did not say, Whosoever lusteth
after a woman, but," Whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after
her,"[2] i.e. turneth toward her with this aim and this intent, that he
may lust after her; which, in fact, is not merely to be tickled[3] by
fleshly delight, but fully to consent to lust; so that the forbidden
appetite is not restrained, but satisfied if opportunity should be
given.
34. For there are three things which go to complete sin: the suggestion
of, the taking pleasure in, and the consenting to. Suggestion takes
place either by means of memory, or by means of the bodily senses, when
we see, or hear, or smell, or taste, or touch anything. And if it give
us pleasure to enjoy this, this pleasure, if illicit, must be
restrained. Just as when we are fasting, and on seeing food the
appetite of the palate is stirred up, this does not happen without
pleasure; but we do not consent to this liking, and[4] we repress it by
the right of reason, which has the supremacy. But if consent shall take
place, the sin will be complete, known to God in our heart, although it
may not become known to men by deed. There are, then, these steps: the
suggestion is made, as it were, by a serpent, that is to say, by a
fleeting and rapid, i.e. a temporary, movement of bodies: for if
there are also any such images moving about in the soul, they have been
derived from without from the body; and if any hidden sensation of the
body besides those five senses touches the soul, that also is temporary
and fleeting; and therefore the more clandestinely it glides in, so as
to affect the process of thinking, the more aptly is it compared to a
serpent. Hence these three stages, as I was beginning to say, resemble
that transaction which is described in Genesis, so that the suggestion
and a certain measure of suasion is put forth, as it were, by the
serpent; but the taking pleasure in it lies in the carnal appetite, as
it were in Eve; and the consent lies in the reason, as it were in the
man: and these things having been acted through, the man is driven
forth, as it were, from paradise, i.e. from the most blessed light of
righteousness, into death[5]--in all respects most
righteously. For he who puts forth suasion does not compel. And all
natures are beautiful in their order, according to their gradations;
but we must not descend from the higher, among which the rational mind
has its place assigned, to the lower. Nor is any one compelled to do
this; and therefore, if he does it, he is punished by the just law of
God, for he is not guilty of this unwillingly. But yet, previous to
habit, either there is no pleasure, or it is so slight that there is
hardly any; and to yield to it is a great sin, as such pleasure is
unlawful. Now, when any one does yield, he commits sin in the heart.
If, however, he also proceeds to action, the desire seems to be
satisfied and extinguished; but afterwards, when the suggestion is
repeated, a greater pleasure is kindled, which, however, is as yet much
less than that which by continuous practice is converted into habit.
For it
is very difficult to overcome this; and yet even habit itself, if one
does not prove untrue to himself, and does not shrink back in dread
from the Christian warfare, he will get the better of under His (i.e.
Christ's) leadership and assistance; and thus, in accordance with
primitive peace and order, both the man is subject to Christ, and the
woman is subject to the man.[1]
35. Hence, just as we arrive at sin by three steps,--suggestion,
pleasure, consent,--so of sin itself there are three varieties,--in
heart, in deed, in habit,--as it were, three deaths: one, as it were,
in the house, i.e. when we consent to lust in the heart; a second now,
as it were, brought forth outside the gate, when assent goes forward
into action; a third, when the mind is pressed down by the force of bad
habit, as if by a mound of earth, and is now, as it were, rotting in
the sepulchre. And whoever reads the Gospel perceives that our Lord
raised to life these three varieties of the dead. And perhaps he
reflects what differences may be found in the very word of Him who
raises them, when He says on one occasion, "Damsel, arise;"[2] on
another, "Young man,[3] I say unto thee, Arise ;"[4] and when on
another occasion He groaned in the spirit, and wept, and again groaned,
and then afterwards "cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth."[5]
36. And therefore, under the category of the adultery mentioned in this
section, we must understand all fleshly and sensual lust. For when
Scripture so constantly speaks of idolatry as fornication, and the
Apostle Paul calls avarice by the name of idolatry,[6] who doubts but
that every evil lust is rightly called fornication, since the soul,
neglecting the higher law by which it is ruled, and prostituting itself
for the base pleasure of the lower nature as its reward (so to speak),
is thereby corrupted? And therefore let every one who feels carnal
pleasure rebelling against right inclination in his own case through
the habit of sinning, by whose unsubdued violence he is dragged into
captivity, recall to mind as much as he can what kind of peace he has
lost by sinning, and let him cry out, "O wretched man that I am! who
shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through
Jesus Christ."[7] For in this way, when he cries out that he is
wretched, in the act of bewailing he implores the help of a comforter.
Nor is it a small approach to blessedness, when he has come to know his
wretchedness; and therefore "blessed" also "are they that mourn,[8] for
they shall be comforted."
CHAP. XIII.--37.
In the next place, He goes on to say: "And if thy right eye offend
thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for
thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body
should go[9] into hell." Here, certainly, there is need of great
courage in order to cut off one's members.[10] For whatever it is that
is mean.t by the "eye," undoubtedly it is such a thing as is ardently
loved. For those who wish to express their affection strongly are wont
to speak thus: I love him as my own eyes, or even more than my own
eyes. Then, when the word "right" is added, it is meant perhaps to
intensify the
strength of the affection.[11] For although these bodily eyes of ours
are turned in a common direction for the purpose of seeing, and if both
are turned they have equal power, yet men are more afraid of losing the
right one. So that the sense in this case is: Whatever it is which thou
so lovest that thou reckonest it as a right eye, if it offends thee,
i.e. if it proves a hindrance to thee on the way to true happiness,
pluck it out and cast it from thee. For it is profitable for thee, that
one of these which thou so lovest that they cleave to thee as if they
were members, should perish, rather than that thy whole body should be
cast into hell.
38. But since He follows it up with a similar statement respecting the
right hand, "If thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it
from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should
perish, and not that thy whole body should go[12] into hell," He
compels us to inquire more carefully what He has spoken of as an eye.
And as regards this inquiry, nothing occurs to me as a more suitable
explanation than a greatly beloved friend: for this, certainly, is
something which we may rightly call a member which we ardently love;
and this friend a counsellor, for it is an eye, as it were, pointing
out the road; and that in divine things, for it is the right eye: so
that the left is indeed a beloved counsellor, but in earthly matters,
pertaining to the necessities of the body; concerning which as a cause
of stumbling it was superfluous to speak, inasmuch as not even the
right was to be spared. Now, a counsellor in divine things is a cause
of stumbling, if he endeavours to lead one into any dangerous heresy
under the guise of religion and doctrine. Hence also let the right hand
be taken in the sense of a beloved helper and assistant in divine
works: for in like manner as contemplation is rightly understood as
having its seat in the eye, so action in the right hand; so that the
left hand may be understood in reference to works which are necessary
for this life, and for the body.
CHAP. XIV.--39.
"It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her
a writing of divorcement." This is the lesser righteousness of the
Pharisees, which is not opposed by what our Lord says: "But I say unto
you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of
fornication, causeth her to commit adultery:[1] and whosoever shall
marry her that is loosed from her husband committeth adultery."[2] For
He who gave the commandment that a writing of divorcement should be
given, did not give the commandment that a wife should be put away; but
"whosoever shall put away," says He, "let him give her a writing of
divorcement," in order that the thought of such a writing might
moderate the rash anger of him who was getting rid of his wife. And,
therefore, He who sought to interpose a delay in putting away,
indicated as far as He could to hard-hearted men that He did not wish
separation. And accordingly the Lord Himself in another passage, when a
question was asked Him as to this matter, gave this reply: "Moses did
so because of the hardness of your hearts." [3] For however
hard-hearted a man may be who wishes to put away his wife, when he
reflects that, on a writing of divorcement being given her, she could
then without risk marry another, he would be easily appeased. Our Lord,
therefore, in order to confirm that principle, that a wife should not
lightly be put away, made the single exception of fornication; but
enjoins that all other annoyances, if any such should happen to spring
up, be borne
with fortitude for the sake of conjugal fidelity and for the sake of
chastity; and he also calls that man an adulterer who should marry her
that has been divorced by her husband. And the Apostle Paul shows the
limit of this state of affairs, for he says it is to be observed as
long as her husband liveth; but on the husband's death he gives
permission to marry.[4] For he himself also held by this rule, and
therein brings forward not his own advice, as in the case of some of
his admonitions, but a command by the Lord when he says: "And unto the
married[5] I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife[5]
depart from her husband: but and if she depart, let her remain
unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put
away his wife."[6] I believe that, according to a similar rule, if he
shall put her away, he is to remain unmarried, or be reconciled to his
wife.
For it may happen that he puts away his wife for the cause of
fornication, which our Lord wished to make an exception of. But now, if
she is not allowed to marry while the husband is living from whom she
has departed, nor he to take another while the wife is living whom he
has put away, much less is it right to commit unlawful acts of
fornication with any parties whomsoever. More blessed indeed are those
marriages to be reckoned, where the parties concerned, whether after
the procreation of children, or even through contempt of such an
earthly progeny, have been able with common consent to practise
self-restraint toward each other: both because nothing is done contrary
to that precept whereby the Lord forbids a spouse to be put away (for
he does not put her away who lives with her not carnally, but
spiritually), and because that principle is observed to which the
apostle gives expression, "It remaineth, that they that have wives be
as though they had none."[7]
CHAP. XV.--40.
But it is rather that statement which the Lord Himself makes in another
passage which is wont to disturb the minds of the little ones, who
nevertheless earnestly desire to live now according to the precepts of
Christ: "If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother,
and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own
life also, he cannot be my disciple."[8] For it may seem a
contradiction to the less intelligent, that here He forbids the putting
away of a wife saving for the cause of fornication, but that elsewhere
He affirms that no one can be a disciple of His who does not hate his
wife. But if He
were speaking with reference to sexual intercourse, He would not place
father, and mother, and brothers in the same category. But how true it
is, that "the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and they that use
violence take it by force!"[9] For how great violence is necessary, in
order that a man may love his enemies, and hate his father, and mother,
and wife, and children, and brothers! For He commands both things who
calls us to the kingdom of heaven. And how these things do not
contradict each other, it is easy to show under His guidance; but after
they have been understood, it is difficult to carry them out, although
this too is very easy when He Himself assists us. For in that eternal
kingdom to which He has vouchsafed to call His disciples, to whom He
also gives the name of brothers, there are no temporal relationships of
this sort. For "there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is
neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female;" "but Christ
is all, and in all."[1] And the Lord Himself says: "For in' the
resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage,[2] but are
as the angels of God in heaven."[3] Hence it is necessary that whoever
wishes here and now to aim after the life of that kingdom, should hate
not the persons themselves, but those temporal relationships by which
this life of ours, which is transitory and is comprised in being born
and dying, is upheld; because he who does not hate them, does not yet
love that life where there is no condition of being born and dying,
which unites parties in earthly wedlock.
41. Therefore, if I were to ask any good Christian who has a wife, and
even though he may still be having children by her, whether he would
like to have his wife in that kingdom; mindful in any case of the
promises of God, and of that life where this incorruptible shall put on
incorruption, and this mortal shall put on immortality;[4] though at
present hesitating from the greatness, or at least from a certain
degree of love, he would reply with execration that he is strongly
averse to it. Were I to ask him again, whether he would like his wife
to live with him there, after the resurrection, when she had undergone
that angelic change which is promised to the saints, he would reply
that he desired this as strongly as he reprobated the other. Thus a
good Christian is found in one and the same woman to love the creature
of God, whom he desires to be transformed and renewed; but to hate
the corruptible and mortal conjugal connection and sexual intercourse:
i.e. to love in her what is characteristic of a human being, to hate
what belongs to her as a wife. So also he loves his enemy, not in as
far as he is an enemy, but in as far as he is a man; so that he wishes
the same prosperity to come to him as to himself, viz. that he may
reach the kingdom of heaven rectified and renewed. This is to be
understood both of father and mother and the other ties of blood, that
we hate in them what has fallen to the lot of the human race in being
born and dying, but that we love what can be carried along with us to
those realms where no one says, My Father; but all say to the one God,
"Our Father:" and no one says, My mother; but all say to that other
Jerusalem, Our mother: and no one says, My brother; but each says
respecting every other, Our brother. But in fact there will be a
marriage on our part as of one spouse (when we have been brought
together into unity), with Him who hath delivered us from the pollution
of this world by the shedding of His own blood. It is necessary,
therefore, that the disciple of Christ should hate these things which
pass away, in those whom he desires along with himself to reach those
things which shall for ever remain; and that he should the more hate
these things in them, the more he loves themselves.
42. A Christian may therefore live in concord with his wife, whether
with her providing for a fleshly craving, a thing which the apostle
speaks by permission, not by commandment; or providing for the
procreation of children, which may be at present in some degree
praiseworthy; or providing for a brotherly and sisterly fellowship,
without any corporeal connection, having his wife as though he had her
not, as is most excellent and sublime in the marriage of Christians:
yet so that in her he hates the name of temporal relationship, and
loves the hope of everlasting blessedness. For we hate, without doubt,
that respecting which we wish at least, that at some time hereafter it
should not exist; as, for instance, this same life of ours in the
present world, which if we were not to hate as being temporal, we would
not long for the future life, which is not conditioned by time. For as
a
substitute for this life the soul is put, respecting which it is said
in that passage, "If a man hate not his own soul s also, he cannot be
my disciple." For that corruptible meat is necessary for this life, of
which the Lord Himself says, "Is not the soul[6] more than meat?" i.e.
this life to which meat is necessary. And when He says that He would
lay down His soul[7] for His sheep, He undoubtedly means this life, as
He is declaring that He is going to die for us.
CHAP. XVI.--43.
Here there arises a second question, when the Lord allows a wife to be
put away for the cause of fornication, in what latitude of meaning
fornication is to be understood in this passage,--whether in the sense
understood by all, viz. that we are to understand that fornication to
be meant which is committed in acts of uncleanness; or whether, in
accordance with the usage of Scripture in speaking of fornication (as
has been mentioned above), as meaning all unlawful corruption, such as
idolatry or covetousness, and therefore, of course, every transgression
of the law on account of the unlawful lust [involved in it].[1] But let
us
consult the apostle, that we may not say rashly. "And unto the married
I command," says he, "yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart
from her husband: but and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or
be reconciled to her husband." For it may happen that she departs for
that cause for which the Lord gives permission to do so. Or, if a woman
is at liberty to put away her husband for other causes besides that of
fornication, and the husband is not at liberty, what answer shall we
give respecting this statement which he has made afterwards, "And let
not the husband put away his wife "? Wherefore did he not add, saving
for the cause of fornication, which the Lord permits, unless because he
wishes a similar rule to be understood, that if he shall put away his
wife (which he is permitted to do for the cause of fornication), he is
to remain without a wife, or be reconciled to his
wife? For it would not be a bad thing for a husband to be reconciled to
such a woman as that to whom, when nobody had dared to stone her, the
Lord said, "Go, and sin no more."[2] And for this reason also, because
He who says, It is not lawful to put away one's wife saving for the
cause of fornication, forces him to retain his wife, if there should be
no cause of fornication: but if there should be, He does not force him
to put her away, but permits him, just as when it is said, Let it not
be lawful for a woman to marry another, unless her husband be dead; if
she shall marry before the death of her husband, she is guilty; if she
shall not marry after the death of her husband, she is not guilty, for
she is not commanded to marry, but merely permitted. If, therefore,
there is a like rule in the said law of marriage between man and woman,
to such an extent that not merely of the woman has
the same apostle said, "The wife hath not power of her own body, but
the husband;" but he has not been silent respecting him, saying, "And
likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the
wife;"--if, then, the rule is similar, there is no necessity for
understanding that it is lawful for a woman to put away her husband,
saving for the cause of fornication, as is the case also with the
husband.
44. It is therefore to be considered in what latitude of meaning we
ought to understand the word fornication, and the apostle is to be
consulted, as we were beginning to do. For he goes on to say, "But to
the rest speak I, not the Lord." Here, first, we must see who are "the
rest," for he was speaking before on the part of the Lord to those who
are married, but now, as from himself, he speaks to "the rest:" hence
perhaps to the unmarried, but this does not follow. For thus he
continues: "If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be
pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away." Hence, even now
he is speaking to those who are married. What, then, is his object in
saying "to the rest," unless that he was speaking before to those who
were so united, that they were alike as to their faith in Christ; but
that now he is speaking to "the rest," i.e. to those who are so
united, that they are not both believers ? But what does he say to them
? "If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to
dwell with him, let him not put her away. And the woman which hath an
husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let
her not put him away." If, therefore, he does not give a command as
from the Lord, but advises as from himself, then this good result
springs from it, that if any one act otherwise, he is not a
transgressor of a command, just as he says a little after respecting
virgins, that he has no command of the Lord, but that he gives his
advice; and he so praises virginity, that whoever will may avail
himself of it; yet if he shall not do so, he may not be judged to have
acted contrary to a command. For there is one thing which is commanded,
another respecting which advice is given, another still which is
allowed.[3]
A wife is commanded not to depart from her husband; and if she depart,
to remain unmarried, or to be reconciled to her husband: therefore it
is not allowable for her to act otherwise. But a believing husband is
advised, if he has an unbelieving wife who is pleased to dwell with
him, not to put her away: therefore it is allowable also to put her
away, because it is no command of the Lord that he should not put her
away, but an advice of the apostle: just as a virgin is advised not to
marry; but if she shall marry, she will not indeed adhere to the
advice, but she will not act in opposition to a command. Allowance is
given [4] when it is said, "But I speak this by permission, and not of
commandment." And therefore, if it is allowable that an unbelieving
wife should be put away, although it is better not to put her away, and
yet not allowable, according to the commandment of the Lord, that
a wife should be put away, saving for the cause of fornication, [then]
unbelief itself also is fornication.
45. For what sayest thou, O apostle? Surely, that a believing husband
who has an unbelieving wife pleased to dwell with him is not to put her
away? Just so, says he. When, therefore, the, Lord also gives this
command, that a man should not put away his wife, saving for the cause
of: fornication, why dost thou say here, "I speak, not the Lord "? For
this reason, viz. that the idolatry which unbelievers follow, and every
other noxious superstition, is fornication. Now, the Lord permitted a
wife to be put away for the cause of fornication; but in permitting, He
did not command it: He gave opportunity to the apostle for advising
that whoever wished should not put away an unbelieving wife, in order
that, perchance, in this way she might become a believer. "For," says
he, "the unbelieving husband is sanctified in the wife, and the
unbelieving wife is sanctified in the brother."[1] I
suppose it had already occurred that some wives were embracing the
faith by means of their believing husbands, and husbands by means of
their believing wives; and although not mentioning names, he yet urged
his case by examples, in order to strengthen his counsel. Then he goes
on to say, "Else were your children unclean; but now are they holy."
For now the children were Christians, who were sanctified at the
instance of one of the parents, or with the consent of both; which
would not take place unless the marriage were broken up by one of the
parties becoming a believer, and unless the unbelief of the spouse were
borne with so far as to give an opportunity of believing. This,
therefore, is the counsel of Him whom I regard as having spoken the
words, "Whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay
thee."[2]
46. Moreover, if unbelief is fornication, and idolatry unbelief, and
covetousness idolatry, it is not to be doubted that covetousness also
is fornication. Who, then, in that case can rightly separate any
unlawful lust whatever from the category of fornication, if
covetousness is fornication ? And from this we perceive, that because
of unlawful lusts, not only those of which one is guilty in acts of
uncleanness with another's husband or wife, but any unlawful lusts
whatever, which cause the soul making a bad use of the body to wander
from the law of God, and to be ruinously and basely corrupted, a man
may, without crime, put away his wife, and a wife her husband, because
the Lord makes the cause of fornication an exception; which
fornication, in accordance with the above considerations, we are
compelled to understand as being general and universal.
47. But when He says, "saving for the cause of fornication," He has not
said of which of them, whether the man or the woman.[3] For not only is
it allowed to put away a wife who commits fornication; but whoever puts
away that wife even by whom he is himself compelled to commit
fornication, puts her away undoubtedly for the cause of fornication.
As, for instance, if a wife should compel one to sacrifice to idols,
the man who puts away such an one puts her away for the cause of
fornication, not only on her part, but on his own also: on her part,
because she commits fornication; on his own, that he may not commit
fornication. Nothing, however, is more unjust than for a man to put
away his wife because of fornication, if he himself also is convicted
of committing fornication. For that passage occurs to one: "For wherein
thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest
doest the same things." [4] And for this reason, whosoever wishes to
put away his wife because of fornication, ought first to be cleared of
fornication; and a like remark I would make respecting the woman also.
48. But in reference to what He says, "Whosoever shall marry her that
is divorced[5] committeth adultery," it may be asked whether she also
who is married commits adultery in the same way as he does who marries
her. For she also is commanded to remain unmarried, or be reconciled to
her husband; but this in the case of her departing from her husband.
There is, however, a great difference whether she put away or be put
away. For if she put away her husband, and marry another, she seems to
have left her former husband from a desire of changing her marriage
connection, which is, without doubt, an adulterous thought. But if she
be put away by the husband, with whom she desired to be, he indeed who
marries her commits adultery, according to the Lord's declaration; but
whether she also be involved in a like crime is uncertain,--although it
is much less easy to discover how, when a man and
woman have intercourse one with another with equal consent, one of them
should be an adulterer, and the other not. To this is to be added the
consideration, that if he commits adultery by marrying her who is
divorced from her husband (although she does not put away, but is put
away), she causes him to commit adultery, which nevertheless the Lord
forbids. And hence we infer that, whether she has been put away, or has
put away her husband, it is necessary for her to remain unmarried, or
be reconciled to her husband.[1]
49. Again, it is asked whether, if, with a wife's permission, either a
barren one, or one who does not wish to submit to intercourse, a man
shall take to himself another woman, not another man's wife, nor one
separated from her husband, he can do so without being chargeable with
fornication? And an example is found in the Old Testament history;[2]
but now there are greater precepts which the human race has reached
after having passed that stage; and those matters are to be
investigated for the purpose of distinguishing the ages of the
dispensation of that divine providence which assists the human race in
the most orderly way; but not for the purpose of making use of the
rules of living. But yet it may be asked whether what the apostle says,
"The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband; and likewise
also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife," can be
carried so far, that, with the permission of a wife, who possesses the
power over her husband's body, a man can have intercourse with another
woman, who is neither another man's wife nor divorced from her husband;
but such an opinion is not to be entertained, lest it should seem that
a woman also, with her husband's permission, could do such a thing,
which the instinctive feeling of every one prevents.
50. And yet some occasions may arise, where a wife also, with the
consent of her husband, may seem under obligation to do this for the
sake of that husband himself; as, for instance, is said to have
happened at Antioch about fifty years ago,[3] in the times of
Constantius. For Acyndinus, at that time prefect and at one time also
consul, when he demanded of a certain public debtor the payment of a
poundweight of gold, impelled by I know not what motive, did a thing
which is often dangerous in the case of those magistrates to whom
anything whatever is lawful, or rather is thought to be lawful, viz.
threatened with an oath and with a vehement affirmation, that if he did
not pay the foresaid gold on a certain day which he had fixed, he would
be put to death. Accordingly, while he was being kept in cruel
confinement, and was unable to rid himself of that debt, the dread day
began to
impend and to draw near. He happened, however, to have a very beautiful
wife, but one who had no money wherewith to come to the relief of her
husband; and when a certain rich man had had his desires inflamed by
the beauty of this woman, and had learned that her husband was placed
in that critical situation, he sent to her, promising in return for a
single night, if she would consent to hold intercourse with him, that
he would give her the pound of gold. Then she, knowing that she herself
had not power over her body, but her husband, conveyed the intelligence
to him, telling him that she was prepared to do it for the sake of her
husband, but only if he himself, the lord by marriage of her body, to
whom all that chastity was due, should wish it to be done, as if
disposing of his own property for the sake of his life. He thanked her,
and commanded that it should be done, in no wise judging
that it was an adulterous embrace, because it was no lust, but great
love for her husband, that demanded it, at his own bidding and will.
The woman came to the villa of that rich man, did what the lewd man
wished; but she gave her body only to her husband, who desired not, as
was usual, his marriage rights, but life. She received the gold; but he
who gave it took away stealthily what he had given, and substituted a
similar bag with earth in it. When the woman, however, on reaching her
home, discovered it, she rushed forth in public in order to proclaim
the deed she had done, animated by the same tender affection for her
husband by which she had been forced to do it; she goes to the prefect,
confesses everything, shows the fraud that had been practised upon her.
Then indeed the prefect first pronounces himself guilty, because the
matter had come to this by means of his threats, and, as if
pronouncing sentence upon another, decided that a pound of gold should
be brought into the treasury from the property of Acyndinus; but that
she (the woman) be installed as mistress of that piece of land whence
she had received the earth instead of the gold. I offer no opinion
either way from this story: let each one form a judgment as he pleases,
for the history is not drawn from divinely authoritative sources; but
yet, when the story is related, man's instinctive sense does not so
revolt against what was done in the case of this woman, at her
husband's bidding, as we formerly shuddered when the thing itself was
set forth without any example. But in this section of the Gospel
nothing is to be more steadily kept in view, than that so great is the
evil of fornication, that, while married people are bound to one
another by so strong a bond, this one cause of divorce is excepted; but
as to what fornication is, that we have already discussed.[1]
CHAP. XVII.--51.
"Again," says He, "ye have heard that it hath been said to them of old
time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord
thine oath:[2] But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven,
for it is God's throne; nor by the earth, for it is His footstool;
neither by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. Neither
shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair
white or black. But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for
whatsoever is more 3 than these cometh of evil." The righteousness of
the Pharisees is not to forswear oneself; and this is confirmed by Him
who gives
the command not to swear, so far as relates to the righteousness of the
kingdom of heaven. For just as he who does not speak at all cannot
speak falsely, so he who does not swear at all cannot swear falsely.
But yet, since he who takes God to witness swears, this section must be
carefully considered, lest the apostle should seem to have acted
contrary to the Lord's precept, who often swore in this way, when he
says, "Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God I lie
not;"[4] and again, "The God and Father of our LOrd Jesus Christ, which
is blessed for evermore, knoweth that I lie not." s Of like nature also
is that asseveration, "For God is my witness, whom I serve with my
spirit in the gospel of His Son, that without ceasing I make mention of
you always in my prayers."[6] Unless, perchance, one were to say that
it is to be reckoned swearing only when something is spoken of
by which one swears; so that he has not used an oath, because he has
not said, by God; but has said, "God is witness." It is ridiculous to
think so; yet because of the contentious, or those very slow of
apprehension, lest any one should think there is a difference, let him
know that the apostle has used an oath in this way also, saying, "By
your rejoicing, I die daily."[7] And let no one think that this is so
expressed as if it were said, Your rejoicing makes me die daily; just
as it is said, By his teaching he became learned, i.e. by his teaching
it came about that he was perfectly instructed: the Greek copies decide
the matter, where we find it written, N<greek>h</greek>
<greek>thn</greek> <greek>kauchsin</greek>
<greek>umeteran</greek>, an expression which is used only
by one taking an oath. Thus, then, it is understood that the Lord
gave the command not to swear in this sense, lest any one should
eagerly seek after an oath as a good thing, and by the constant use of
oaths sink down through force of habit into perjury. And therefore let
him who understands that swearing is to be reckoned not among things
that are good, but among things that are necessary, refrain as far as
he can from indulging in it, unless by necessity, when he sees men slow
to believe what it is useful for them to believe, except they be
assured by an oath. To this, accordingly, reference is made when it is
said, "Let your speech be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay;" this is good, and what
is to be desired. "For whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil;"
i.e., if you are compelled to swear, know that it comes of a necessity
arising from the infirmity of those whom you are trying to persuade of
something; which infirmity is certainly an evil, from which
we daily pray to be delivered, when we say, "Deliver us from evil."[8]
Hence He has not said, Whatsoever is more than these is evil; for you
are not doing what is evil when you make a good use of an oath, which,
although not in itself good, is yet necessary in order to persuade
another that you are trying to move him for some useful end; but it
"cometh of evil" on his part by whose infirmity you are compelled to
swear.[9] But no one learns, unless he has had experience, how
difficult it is both to get rid of a habit of swearing, and never to do
rashly what necessity sometimes compels him to do.[1]
52. But it may be asked why, when it was said, "But I say unto you,
Swear not at all," it was added, "neither by heaven, for it is God's
throne," etc., up to "neither by thy head." I suppose it was for this
reason, that the Jews did not think they were bound by the oath, if
they had sworn by such things: and since they had heard it said, "Thou
shalt perform unto the Lord thine oath," they did not think an oath
brought them under obligation to the Lord, if they swore by heaven, or
earth, or by Jerusalem, or by their head; and this happened not from
the fault of Him who gave the command, but because they did not rightly
understand it. Hence the Lord teaches that there is nothing so
worthless among the creatures of God, as that any one should think that
he may swear falsely by it; since created things, from the highest down
to the lowest, beginning with the throne of God and going down
to a white or black hair, are ruled by divine providence. "Neither by
heaven," says He, "for it is God's throne; nor by the earth, for it is
His footstool:" i.e., when you swear by heaven or the earth, do not
imagine that your oath does not bring you under obligation to the Lord;
for you are convicted of swearing by Him who has heaven for His throne,
and the earth for His footstool. "Neither by Jerusalem, for it is the
city of the great King;" a better expression than if He had said, "My
[city]; although, however, we understand Him to have meant this. And,
because He is undoubtedly the Lord, the man who swears by Jerusalem is
bound by his oath to the Lord. "Neither shall thou swear by thy head."
Now, what could any one suppose to belong more to himself than his own
head? But how is it ours, when we have not the power of making one hair
white or black? Hence, whoever should wish to swear
even by his own head, is bound by his oath to God, who in an ineffable
way keeps all things in His power, and is everywhere present. And here
also all other things are understood, which could not of course be
enumerated; just as that saying of the apostle we have mentioned, "By
your rejoicing, I die daily." And to show that he was bound by this
oath to the Lord, he has added, "which I have in Christ Jesus."
53. But yet (I make the remark for the sake of the carnal) we must not
think that heaven is called God's throne, and the earth His footstool,
because God has members placed in heaven and in earth, in some such way
as we have when we sit down; but that seat means judgment. And since,
in this organic whole of the universe, heaven has the greatest
appearance, and earth the least,--as if the divine power were more
present where the beauty excels, but still were regulating the least
degree of it in the most distant and in the lowest regions,--He is said
to sit in heaven, and to tread upon the earth. But spiritually the
expression heaven means holy souls, and earth sinful ones: and since
the spiritual man judges all things, yet he himself is judged of no
man,[2] he is suitably spoken of as the seat of God; but the sinner to
whom it is said, "Earth thou art, and unto earth shall thou
return,"[3] because, in accordance with that justice which assigns what
is suitable to men's deserts, he is placed among things that are
lowest, and he who would not remain in the law is punished under the
law, is suitably taken as His footstool.
CHAP. XVIII.--54.
But now, to conclude by summing up this passage, what can be named or
thought of more laborious and toilsome, where the believing soul is
straining every nerve of its industry, than the subduing of vicious
habit? Let such an one cut off the members which obstruct the kingdom
of heaven, and not be overwhelmed by the pain: in conjugal fidelity let
him bear with everything which, however grievously annoying it may be,
is still free from the guilt of unlawful corruption, i.e. of
fornication: as, for instance, if any one should have a wife either
barren, or misshapen in body, or faulty in her members,--either blind,
or deaf, or
lame, or having any other defect,--or worn out by diseases and pains
and weaknesses, and whatever else may be thought of exceeding horrible,
fornication excepted, let him endure it for the sake of his plighted
love and conjugal union;[1] and let him not only not put away such a
wife, but even if he have her not, let him not marry one who has been
divorced by her husband, though beautiful, healthy, rich, fruitful. And
if it is not lawful to do such things, much less is it to be deemed
lawful for him to come near any other unlawful embrace; and let him so
flee from fornication, as to withdraw himself from base corruption of
every sort. Let him speak the truth, and let him commend it not by
frequent oaths, but by the probity of his morals; and with respect to
the innumerable crowds of all bad habits rising up in rebellion against
him, of which, in order that all may be understood, a few
have been mentioned, let him betake himself to the citadel of Christian
warfare, and let him lay them prostrate, as if from a higher ground.
But who would venture to enter upon labours so great, unless one who is
so inflamed with the love of righteousness, that, as it were utterly
consumed with hunger and thirst, and thinking there is no life for him
till that is satisfied, he puts forth violence to obtain the kingdom of
heaven? For otherwise he will not be able bravely to endure all those
things which the lovers of this world reckon toilsome and arduous, and
altogether difficult in getting rid of bad habits. "Blessed,"
therefore, "are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness:
for they shall be filled."
55. But yet, when any one encounters difficulty in these toils, and
advancing through hardships and roughnesses surrounded with various
temptations, and perceiving the troubles of his past life rise up on
this side and on that, becomes afraid lest he should not be able to
carry through what he has undertaken, let him eagerly avail himself of
the counsel that he may obtain assistance. But what other counsel is
there than this, that he who desires to have divine help for his own
infirmity should bear that of others, and should assist it as much as
possible ? And so, therefore, let us look at the precepts of mercy. The
meek and the merciful man, however, seem to be one and the same: but
there is this difference, that the meek man, of whom we have spoken
above, from piety does not gainsay the divine sentences which are
brought forward against his sins, nor those statements of God which
he does not yet understand; but he confers no benefit on him whom he
does not gainsay or resist. But the merciful man in such a way offers
no resistance, that he does it for the purpose of correcting him whom
he would render worse by resisting.
CHAP. XIX.--56.
Hence the Lord goes on to say: "Ye have heard that it hath been said,
An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: but I say unto you, that ye
resist not evil;[2] but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek,
turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law,
and take away thy coat [tunic, undergarment], let him have thy cloak[3]
also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.
Give to him that asketh thee,[4] and from him that would borrow of thee
turn not thou away." It is the lesser righteousness of the Pharisees
not to go beyond measure in revenge, that no one should give back more
than he has received: and this is a great step. For it is not easy to
find any one who, when he has received a blow, wishes merely to return
the blow; and who, on hearing one word from a man who reviles him, is
content to return only one, and that just an equivalent; but he avenges
it more immoderately, either under the disturbing influence of anger,
or because he thinks it just, that he who first inflicted injury should
suffer more severe injury than he suffered who had not inflicted
injury. Such a spirit was in great measure restrained by the law, where
it was written, "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth;" by which
expressions a certain measure is intended, so that the vengeance should
not exceed the injury. And this is the beginning of peace: but perfect
peace is to have no wish at all for such vengeance.
57. Hence, between that first course which goes beyond the law, that a
greater evil should be inflicted in return for a lesser, and this to
which the Lord has given expression for the purpose of perfecting the
disciples, that no evil at all should be inflicted in return for evil,
a middle course holds a certain place, viz. that as much be paid back
as has been received; by means of which enactment the transition is
made from the highest discord to the highest concord, according to the
distribution of times. See, therefore, at how great a distance any one
who is the first to do harm to another, with the desire of injuring and
hurting him, stands from him who, even when injured, does not pay back
the injury. That man, however, who is not the first to do harm to any
one, but who yet, when injured, inflicts a greater injury in return,
either in will or in deed, has so far withdrawn
himself from the highest injustice, and made so far an advance to the
highest righteousness; but still he does not yet hold by what the law
given by Moses commanded. And therefore he who pays back just as much
as he has received already forgives something: for the party who
injures does not deserve merely as much punishment as the man who was
injured by him has innocently suffered. And accordingly this
incomplete, by no means severe, but [rather] merciful justice, is
carried to perfection by Him who came to fulfil the law, not to destroy
it. Hence there are still two intervening steps which He has left to be
understood, while He has chosen rather to speak of the very highest
development of mercy. For there is still what one may do who does not
come fully up to that magnitude of the precept which belongs to the
kingdom of heaven; acting in such a way that he does not pay back as
much, but
less; as, for instance, one blow instead of two, or that he cuts off an
ear for an eye that has been plucked out. He who, rising above this,
pays back nothing at all, approaches the Lord's precept, but yet he
does not reach it. For still it seems to the Lord not enough, if, for
the evil which you may have received, you should inflict no evil in
return, unless you be prepared to receive even more. And therefore He
does not say, "But I say unto you," that you are not to return evil for
evil; although even this would be a great precept: but He says, "that
ye resist not evil;"[1] so that not only are you not to pay back what
may have been inflicted on you, but you are not even to resist other
inflictions. For this is what He also goes on to explain: "But
whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other
also:" for He does not say, If any man smite thee, do not wish to
smite him; but, Offer thyself further to him if he should go on to
smite thee. As regards compassion, they feel it most who minister to
those whom they greatly love as if they were their children, or some
very dear friends in sickness, or little children, or insane persons,
at whose hands they often endure many things; and if their welfare
demand it, they even show themselves ready to endure more, until the
weakness either of age or of disease pass away. And so, as regards
those whom the Lord, the Physician of souls, was instructing to take
care of their neighbours, what else could He teach them, than that they
endure quietly the infirmities of those whose welfare they wish to
consult? For all wickedness arises from infirmity[2] of mind: because
nothing is more harmless than the man who is perfect in virtue.
58. But it may be asked what the right cheek means. For this is the
reading we find in the Greek copies, which are most worthy of
confidence; though many Latin ones have only the word "cheek," without
the addition of "right." Now the face is that by which any one is
recognised; and we read in the apostle's writings, "For ye suffer? if a
man bring you into bondage, if a man devour you, if a man take of you,
if a man exalt himself, if a man smite you on the face:" then
immediately he adds, "I speak as concerning reproach;"[4] so that he
explains what striking on the face is, viz. to be contemned and
despised. Nor is this indeed said by the apostle for this reason, that
they should not bear with those parties; but that they should bear with
himself rather, who so loved them, that he was willing that he himself
should be spent for them.[5] But since the face cannot be called right
and
left, and yet there may be a worth according to the estimate of God and
according to the estimate of this world, it is so distributed as it
were into the right and left cheek that whatever disciple of Christ
might have to bear reproach for being a Christian, he should be much
more ready to bear reproach in himself, if he possesses any of the
honours of this world. Thus this same apostle, if he had kept silence
respecting the dignity which he had in the world, when men were
persecuting in him the Christian name, would not have presented the
other cheek to those that were smiting the right one. For when he said,
I am a Roman citizen,[6] he was not unprepared to submit to be
despised, in that which he reckoned as least, by those who had despised
in him so precious and life-giving a name. For did he at all the less
on that account afterwards submit to the chains, which it was not
lawful to
put on Roman citizens, or did lie wish to accuse any one of this
injury? And if any spared him on account of the name of Roman
citizenship, yet he did not on that account refrain from offering an
object they might strike at, since he wished by his patience to cure of
so great perversity those whom he saw honouring in him what belonged to
the left members rather than the right. For that point only is to be
attended to, in what spirit he did everything, how benevolently and
mildly he acted toward those from whom he was suffering such things.
For when he was smitten with the hand by order of the high priest, what
he seemed to say contumeliously when he affirms, "God shall smite thee,
thou whited wall," sounds like an insult to those who do not understand
it; but to those who do, it is a prophecy. For a whited wall is
hypocrisy, i.e. pretence holding forth the sacerdotal dignity before
itself, and under this name, as under a white covering, concealing an
inner and as it were sordid baseness. For what belonged to humility he
wonderfully preserved, when, on its being said to him, "Revilest thou
the high priest?"[1] he replied, "I wist not, brethren, that he was the
high priest; for it is written, Thou shall not speak evil of the ruler
of thy people."[2] And here he showed with what calmness he had spoken
that which he seemed to have spoken in anger, because he answered so
quickly and so mildly, which cannot be done by those who are indignant
and thrown into confusion. And in that very statement he spoke the
truth to those who understood him, "I wist not that he was the high
priest:"[3] as if he said, I know another High Priest, for whose name I
bear such things, whom it is not lawful to revile, and whom ye revile,
since in me it is nothing else but His name that ye hate.
Thus, therefore, it is necessary for one not to boast of such things in
a hypocritical way, but to be prepared in the heart itself for all
things, so that he can sing that prophetic word, "My heart is
prepared,[4] O God, my heart is prepared." For many have learned how to
offer the other cheek, but do not know how to love him by whom they are
struck. But in truth, the Lord Himself, who certainly was the first to
fulfil the precepts which He taught, did not offer the other cheek to
the servant of the high priest when smiting Him thereon; but, so far
from that, said, "If I have spoken evil, hear witness of the evil; [5]
but if well, why smitest thou me?"[6] Yet was He not on that account
unprepared in heart, for the salvation of all, not merely to be smitten
on the other cheek, but even to have His whole body crucified.
59. Hence also what follows, "And if any man will sue thee at the law,
and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak[7] also," is rightly
understood as a precept having reference to the preparation of heart,
not to a vain show of outward deed. But what is said with respect to
the coat and cloak is to be carried out not merely in such things, but
in the case of everything which on any ground of right we speak of as
being ours for time. For if this command is given with respect to what
is necessary, how much more does it become us to contemn what is
superfluous! But still, those things which I have called ours are to be
included in that category under which the Lord Himself gives the
precept, when He says, "If any man will sue thee at the law, and take
away thy coat." Let all these things therefore be understood for which
we may be sued at the law, so that the right to them may pass
from us to him who sues, or for whom he sues; such, for instance, as
clothing, a house, an estate, a beast of burden, and in general all
kinds of property. But whether it is to be understood of slaves also is
a great question. For a Christian ought not to possess a slave in the
same way as a horse or money: although it may happen that a horse is
valued at a greater price than a slave, and some article of gold or
silver at much more. But with respect to that slave, if he is being
educated and ruled by time as his master, in a way more upright, and
more honourable, and more conducing to the fear of God, than can be
done by him who desires to take him away, I do not know whether any one
would dare to say that he ought to be despised like a garment. For a
man ought to love a fellow-man as himself, inasmuch as he is commanded
by the Lord of all (as is shown by what follows) even to love his
enemies.
60. It is carefully to be observed that every tunic[8] is a garment,[9]
but that every garment is not a tunic. Hence the word garment means
more than the word tunic. And therefore I think it is so expressed,
"And if any one will sue thee at the law, and take away thy tunic, let
him have thy garment also," as if He had said, Whoever wishes to take
away thy tunic, give over to him whatever other clothing thou hast. And
so some have interpreted the word pallium, which in the Greek as used
here is <greek>imation</greek>
61. "And whosoever," says He, "shall compel[10] thee to go a mile, go
with him other two." And this, certainly, not so much in the sense that
thou shouldest do it on foot, as that thou shouldest be prepared in
mind to do it. For in the Christian history itself, which is
authoritative, you will find no such thing done by the saints, or by
the Lord Himself when in His human nature, which He condescended to
assume, He was showing us an example of how to live; while at the same
time, in almost all places, you will find them prepared to bear with
equanimity whatever may have been wickedly forced upon them. But are we
to suppose it is said for the sake of the mere expression, "Go with him
other two;" or did He rather wish that three should be completed,--the
number which has the meaning of perfection; so that every one should
remember when he does this, that he is fulfilling perfect
righteousness by compassionately bearing the infirmities of those whom
he wishes to be made whole ? It may seem for this reason also that He
has recommended these precepts by three examples: of which the first
is, if any one shall smite thee on the cheek; the second, if any one
shall wish to take away thy coat; the third, if any one shall compel
thee to go a mile: in which third example twice as much is added to the
original unit, so that in this way the triplet is completed. And if
this number in the passage before us does not, as has been said, mean
perfection, let this be understood, that in laying down His precepts,
as it were beginning with what is more tolerable, He has gradually gone
on, until He has reached as far as the enduring of twice as much more.
For, in the firs |
| |