catena aurea matthew 26
1. And it came to pass, when Jesus had finished all these sayings, he said to his disciples,
2. You know that after two days is the feast of the Passover, and the Son of man is betrayed to be crucified.
HILARY; After the discourse in which the Lord had declared that He
should return in splendor, He announces to them His approaching
Passion, that they might learn the close connection between the
sacrament of the Cross, and the glory of eternity.
RABAN. All these sayings, i.e. about the consummation of the world, and
the day of judgment. Or, finished, because He had fulfilled in doing
and preaching all things from the beginning of the Gospel to His
Passion.
ORIGEN; Yet it is not all barely, but all these; for there were other
sayings which He must speak before He should be delivered up.
AUG. We gather from John's account, that six days before the Passover,
Jesus came to Bethany, and thence entered Jerusalem sitting upon the
ass, after which were done the things related to have been done at
Jerusalem. We understand therefore that four days elapsed from His
coming to Bethany, to make this two days before the Passover. The
difference between the Passover and the feast of unleavened bread is
this; the name Passover is given to that one day on which the lamb was
slain in the evening, that is, the fourteenth moon of the first month;
and on the fifteenth moon, the day that the people came out of Egypt,
followed the festival of unleavened bread. But the Evangelists seem to
use the terms indifferently.
JEROME; The Passover, called in Hebrew Phase, does not come as most
think from 'to suffer,' but from the Hebrew word signifying 'to pass
over;' because the destroyer passed over when he saw the blood on the
doors of the Israelites, and smote them not; or the Lord Himself walked
on high, succoring His people.
REMIG. Or, because by the help of the Lord the Israelitish people, freed from Egyptian bondage, passed forth into liberty.
ORIGEN; He said not, After two days will be, or will come, the feast
east of the Passover, but not meaning the ordinary annual Passover, but
that Passover such as had never before been, the Passover will be
offered.
REMIG. Mystically, that is called the Passover, because on that day
Christ passed out of the world to His Father, from corruption to
incorruption, from life to death, or because He redeemed the world by
causing it savingly to pass from the slavery of the Devil.
JEROME; After the two days of the shining light of the Old and of the
New Testament, the true Passover is slain for the world. Also our
Passover is celebrated when we leave the things of earth, and hasten to
the things of heaven.
ORIGEN; He foretell His crucifixion to His disciples, adding, And the
Son of Man shall be delivered to be crucified; thus fortifying them
against that shock of surprise, which the sight of their Master, led
forth to crucifixion, would otherwise have occasioned them. And He
expresses it impersonally shall be delivered, because God delivered Him
up in mercy to the human race, Judas from covetousness, the Priest for
envy, the Devil through fear that through His teaching the human race
would be plucked out of His hand, little aware how much more that would
be effected by His death, than either by His teaching or miracles.
3. Then assembled together the Chief Priests, and the Scribes,
and the elders of the people, to the palace of the High Priest, who was
called Caiaphas,
4. And consulted that they might take Jesus by subtlety, and kill him.
5. But they said, Not on the feast day, lest there be an uproar among the people.
GLOSS. Then the Evangelist lays before us the hidden springs and machinery by which the Lord's Passion was brought to pass.
REMIG. This, then, is to be referred to the preceding words, and means before the Feast of the Passover.
ORIGEN; Not true Priests and elders, but Priests and elders of what
seemed the people of God, but was indeed the people of Gomorrah; these,
not knowing God's High Priest, laid a plot against Him, not recognizing
the firstborn of the whole creation, yes, even against Him that was
elder than them all, did they take counsel.
CHRYS. With such ill designs they came to the chief Priest, seeking a
sanction whence a prohibition should have issued. There were at that
time several Chief Priests, while the Law allowed but of one, whence it
was manifest that the dissolution of the Jewish state was having its
beginning. For Moses had commanded that there should be one Chief
Priest, whose office should be filled up at death; but in process of
time it grew to be annual. All those then who had been Chief Priests,
are here called Chief Priests.
REMIG. They are condemned both because they were gathered together, and
because they were the Chief Priests; for the more the numbers, and the
higher the rank and station of those who band together for any
villainy, the greater the enormity of what they do, and the heavier the
punishment stored up for them. To show the Lord's innocence and
openness, the Evangelist adds, that they might take Jesus by subtlety,
and kill him.
CHRYS. For what then did they conspire, to seize Him secretly, or put
Him to death? For both; but they feared the people, and therefore
waited till the feast was over, for they said, not on the feast-day.
For the Devil would not that Christ should suffer at the Passover, that
His Passion might not be notorious. The Chief Priests had no fear in
respect of God, namely, that their guilt might be aggravated by the
season, but took into account human things only, lest there be an
uproar among the people.
ORIGEN; By reason of the parties among the populace, those who favored
and those who hated Christ, those who believed and those who believed
not.
LEO; This precaution of the Chief Priests arose not from reverence for
the festival, but from care for the success of their plot; they feared
an insurrection at that season, not because of the guilt the populace
might thereby incur, but because they might rescue Christ.
CHRYS But their fury set aside their caution, and finding a betrayer, they put Christ to death in the middle of the feast.
LEO; We recognize here a providential arrangement whereby the chief men
of the Jews, who had often sought occasion of effecting their cruel
purposes against Christ, could never yet succeed till the days of the
paschal celebration. For it was necessary that the things which had
long been promised in symbol and mystery should be accomplished in
manifest reality, that the typical lamb should be displaced by the
true, and one sacrifice embrace the whole catalogue of the varied
victims. That shadows should give way to substance, and copies to the
presence of the original; victim is commuted for victim, blood is
abolished by blood, and the festival of the Law is at once fulfilled
and changed.
6. Now when Jesus was in Bethany, in the house of Simon the leper,
7. There came to him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment, and poured it on his head, as he sat at meat.
8. But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste?
9. For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor.
10. When Jesus understood it, he said to them, Why trouble you the woman? for she has wrought a good work upon me.
11. For you have the poor always with you; but me you have not always.
12. For in that she has poured this ointment on my body, she did it for my burial.
13. Verily I say to you, Wherever this Gospel shall be preached in the
whole world, there shall also this, that this woman has done, be told
for a memorial of her.
GLOSS. Having set before us the counsels of the chief of the Jews
concerning the death of Christ, the Evangelist would proceed to follow
out their execution, and to relate the bargain of Judas with the Jews
to deliver Him up, but he first shows the cause of this betrayal. He
was grieved that the ointment which the woman poured upon Christ's head
had not been sold that he might have carried off something out of the
price it brought, and to make up this loss he was willing to betray his
Master. And therefore he proceeds, Now when Jews was in Bethany, in the
house of Simon the leper.
JEROME; Not that he was a leper yet, but having been so, and having
been healed by the Savior, he retained the appellation to show forth
the power of Him who healed him.
RABAN. Alabaster is a kind of marble, white but marked with veins of
different colors, which was in use for vessels to hold ointment,
because it was said to preserve it from corruption.
JEROME; Another Evangelist instead of 'alabastrum' has 'nardum pisticam,' that is, genuine, unadulterated.
RABAN. From the Greek faith, whence 'pisticus,' faithful. For this ointment was pure, unadulterated.
ORIGEN; Some one may perhaps think that there are four different women
of whom the Evangelists have written, but I rather agree with those who
think that they are only three; one of whom Matthew and Mark wrote, one
of whom Luke, another of whom John.
JEROME; For let no one think that she who anointed His head and she who
anointed His feet were one and the same; for the latter washed His feet
with her tears, and wiped them with her hair, and is plainly said to
have been a harlot. But of this woman nothing of this kind is recorded,
and indeed a harlot could not have at once been made deserving of the
Lord's head.
AMBROSE; It is possible therefore that they were different persons, and
so all appearance of contradiction between the Evangelists is removed.
Or it is possible that it was the same woman at two different times and
two different stages of desert; first while yet a sinner, afterwards
more advanced.
CHRYS. And in this way it may be the same in the three Evangelists,
Matthew, Mark, and Luke. And not without good reason does the
Evangelist mention Simon's leprosy, to show what gave this woman
confidence to come to Christ. The leprosy was an unclean disease; when
then she saw that Jesus had healed the man with whom He now lodged, she
trusted that He could also cleanse the uncleanness of her soul; and so
whereas other women came to Christ to be healed in their bodies, she
came only for the honor and the healing of her soul, having nothing
diseased in her body; and for this she is worthy our highest
admiration. But she in John is a different woman, the wonderful sister
of Lazarus.
ORIGEN; Matthew and Mark relate that this was done in the house of
Simon the leper; but John says that Jesus came to a house where Lazarus
was; and that not Simon, but Mary and Martha served. Further, according
to John, six days before the Passover, He came to Bethany where Mary
and Martha made Him a supper. But here it is in the house of Simon the
leper, and two days before the Passover. And in Matthew and Mark, it is
the disciples that have indignation with a good intent; in John, Judas
alone with intent to steal; in Luke, no one finds fault.
GREG. Or, we may think that this is the same woman whom Luke calls a sinner, and that names Mary.
AUG. Though the action described in Luke is the same as that described
here, and the name of him with whom the Lord supped is the same, for
Luke also names Simon; yet because it is not contrary to either nature
or custom for two men to bear the same name, it is more probable that
this was another Simon, not the leper, in whose house in Bethany these
things were done. I would only suppose that the woman who on that
occasion came near to Jesus' feet, and this woman, were not two
different persons, but that the same Mary did this twice. The first
time is that narrated by Luke for John mentions it in praise of Mary
before Christ's coming to Bethany, It was that Mary who anointed the
Lord with ointment, and wiped his feet with her hair, whose brother
Lazarus was sick.
Mary therefore had done this before. That she did afterwards in Bethany
is distinct from Luke's account, but is the same event that is recorded
by all three, John, Matthew, and Mark. That Matthew and Mark say it was
the Lord's head that she anointed, and John His feet, is reconciled by
supposing that she anointed both. Against this one might raise a cavil
from what Mark says, that she anointed His head by breaking the box
over it, so that there could be none of the ointment left with which to
anoint His feet also Let such caviler understand, that His feet were
first anointed before the box was broken, and there remained in it, yet
whole, enough wherewith to anoint the head by breaking the box and
shedding the contents.
ID. But let not any suppose that the Lord's feet were by this woman
bathed in ointment after the manner which the luxurious and debauched
use. In all things of this nature, it is not the thing itself, but the
mind of him who uses it, that is in fault. Whoever uses things after
such sort as to pass the bounds observed by good men with whom he
lives, either has some meaning, in what he does, or is vicious. What
then is vice in others, in a divine or prophetic person is a sign of
some great thing. The good order is the good report which one has
gained by the works of a good life, and in following Christ's footsteps
sheds a most precious odor on His feet.
ID. Still there may seem to be some discrepancy between the narrative
of Matthew and Mark who say, that after two days is the feast of the
Passover, and then bring Jesus to Bethany; and that of John, who,
relating this history of the ointment, says Six days before the
Passover. They who urge this do not understand that the events in
Bethany are in Matthew and Mark inserted out of their place, a little
later than the time of their occurrence. Neither of them, it is to be
observed, introduce their account with 'afterwards'.
CHRYS. The disciples had heard their Master say, I will have mercy, and
not sacrifice , wherefore they thought among themselves, If He accepts
not burnt-offerings, much less will He the application of such ointment
as this.
JEROME; I know that some raise a cavil here, because John says that
Judas alone was grieved because he had the bag, and was a thief from
the beginning; but Matthew, that all the disciples were sorrowful.
These know not the figure syllepsis, by which one name is put for many,
and many for one; as Paul in the Epistle to the Hebrews He says, They
were sawn asunder, when it is thought that one only, Esaias namely, was
so.
AUG. We may however understand that the other disciples thought or said
the same, or that they assented to what Judas said, and thus Matthew
and Mark have described their common consent. But Judas said it because
he was a thief, the others out of their care for the poor; and John
desired to mention it only in the case of him whose thievish propensity
he thought ought to be recorded.
CHRYS. The disciples then thought thus, but Jesus, who saw the thoughts
of the woman, suffered it. For her piety was great, and her ardor
unspeakable, wherefore He condescended to suffer her to pour the
ointment on His head. As the Father admitted the smoke and odor of the
slain victim, so also Christ admitted this votive anointing of His
head, though the disciples, who saw not her heart, murmured.
REMIG. He clearly shows that the Apostles had uttered something harsh
against her, when He says, Why trouble you the woman? And beautifully
He adds, She has wrought a good work in me; as much as to say, It is
not a waste of ointment, as you say, but a good work, that is, a
service of piety and demon.
CHRYS. And He says not merely, She has wrought a good, work, but says
first, Why trouble you the woman? to teach us that every good act that
is wrought by any, even though it lack somewhat of exact propriety, yet
we ought to receive, cherish, and cultivate it, and not to require
strict correctness in a beginner. If He had been asked before this was
done by the woman, He would not have directed its doing; but when it
was done, the rebuke of the disciples had no longer any place, and He
Himself to guard the woman from importunate attacks speaks these things
for her comfort.
REMIG. For the poor you have ever with you. The Lord shows in these
words as of set purpose, that they were not to be blamed who ministered
of their substance to Him while He dwelt in a mortal body; forasmuch as
the poor were ever in the Church, to whom the believers might do good
when soever they would, but He would abide in the body with them but a
very short time; whence it follows, But me you shall not have always.
JEROME; Here a question arises how the Lord should have said elsewhere
to His disciples, Lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the
world. but here, Me you shall not have always. I suppose that in this
place He speaks of His bodily presence, which shall not be with them
after the resurrection in daily intercourse and friendship, as it is
now.
REMIG. Or, it is to be explained by supposing this spoken to Judas
only; and He said not, You have not, but You shall not have, because
this was spoken in the person of Judas to all his followers. And He
says, Not always, though they have it at no time, because the wicked
seem to have e Christ in this present world, while they mix among His
members and approach His table, but they shall not always so have Him
when He shall say to His elect, Come, you blessed of my Father. It was
the custom among this people to embalm the bodies of the dead with
divers spices, to the end that they might be kept from corruption as
long as possible. And as this woman was desirous of embalming the
Lord's dead Body, and would not be able because she would be
anticipated by His resurrection, it was therefore arranged by Divine
Providence that she should anoint the Lord's living Body. This then is
what He says, In that she has poured, that is, By anointing My living
Body she shows forth My death and burial.
CHRYS. That this mention of His death and burial might not cause her to
despond, He comforts her by what follows, Verily I say to you, Whenever
&c.
RABAN. That is, To whatsoever place throughout the whole world the
Church shall be propagated, there this also that she has done shall be
told. That also that is added signifies, that as Judas by his reproof
of her has earned evil character of treachery, so has she also earned
the glory of pious devotedness.
JEROME; Note His knowledge of things to come, how though about to
suffer death within two days, He knows that His Gospel will be preached
throughout the whole world.
CHRYS. Behold the accomplishment of this saying; to whatever part of
the world you go, you will find this woman famous, and this has been
wrought by the power of Him who spoke this word. How many victories of
kings and captains have passed into oblivion; how many who built cities
and enslaved many nations are now known neither by report nor by name;
but the deed of this woman pouring forth ointment in the house of a
leper in the presence of twelve men, this resounds throughout the
world, and though so much time has elapsed, the memory of that which
was done is not effaced. But why promised He no spiritual gift to this
woman, but everlasting remembrance only? Because this He did promise
made her confident of receiving the other also; whereas she wrought a
good work, it is clear that she shall receive an adequate reward.
JEROME; Mystically; The Lord, about to suffer for the whole world,
sojourns in Bethany, in the house of obedience, which once was that of
Simon the leper. Simon also is interpreted 'obedient,' or, according to
another interpretation, 'the world,' in whose house the Church is
healed.
ORIGEN; Oil is throughout Scripture put for the work of mercy, with
which the lamp of the word is fed; or for doctrine, the hearing of
which sustains the word of faith when once kindled. All with which men
anoint is comprehensively called oil; and one kind of oil is unguent,
and one kind of unguent is precious. So all righteous acts are called
good works; and of good works there is one kind which we do for, or to,
men; another which we do for, or to, God. And this likewise that we do
for God, in part only advances the good of men, in part, the glory of
God. For example, one does a kindness to a man out of feelings of
natural righteousness, not for God's sake, as the Gentiles sometime
did; such a work is common oil of no fine savor, yet is it acceptable
to God, forasmuch, as Peter says in Clement, the good works that the
unbelievers do, profit them in this world, but avail not to gain them
eternal life in another.
They who do the same for God's sake, profit thereby not in this world
only but in the next also, and that they do is ointment of good savor.
Another sort is that done for the good of men, as alms, and the like.
He who does this to Christians, anoints the Lord's feet, for they are
the Lord's feet; and this penitents are most found to do for remission
of their sins. He who devotes himself to chastity, and continues in
fastings and prayers, and other things which conduce to God's glory
only, this is the ointment which anoints the ford's head, and with
whose odor the whole Church is filled; this is the work meet not for
penitents, but for the perfect, or the doctrine which is necessary for
men; but the acknowledgment of the faith which belongs to God alone, is
the ointment with which the head of Christ is anointed, with which we
are buried together with Christ by baptism into death.
HILARY; In this woman is prefigured the people of the Gentiles, who
gave glory to God in Christ's passion; for she anointed His head, but
the head of Christ is God, and ointment is the fruit of good works. But
the disciples, anxious for the salvation of Israel, say that this ought
to have been sold for the use of the poor designating by a prophetic
instinct the Jews, who lacked faith, by the name of the poor. The Lord
answers that there is abundant time in which they may show their care
for the poor, but that salvation cannot be extended to the Gentiles but
by obedience to His command, if, that is, by the pouring out of this
woman's ointment they are buried together with Him, because
regeneration can only be given to those who are dead in the profession
of baptism. And this her work shall be told wherever this Gospel is
preached, because when Israel draws back, the glory of the Gospel is
preached by the belief of the Gentiles.
14. Then one of the twelve, called Judas Iscariot, went to the Chief Priests,
15. And said to them, What will you give me, and I will deliver him to
you? And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver.
16. And from that time he sought opportunity to betray him.
GLOSS. Having described the occasion of his treachery, the Evangelist proceeds to recount the manner of it.
CHRYS. Then, when, that is, he heard that this Gospel should be
preached every where; for that made him afraid, as it was indeed a mark
of unspeakable power.
AUG. The order of the narrative is this. The Lord says, You know that
after two days will be the feast of the Passover;. . . then assembled
together the Chief Priests and Scribes;. . . then went one of the
twelve. Thus the narrative of what took place at Bethany is inserted by
way of digression, respecting an earlier time between that, Lest there
be an uproar, and, Then one of the twelve.
ORIGEN; Went, against that one high priest, who was made a Priest for
ever, to many high priests, to sell for a price Him who sought to
redeem the whole world.
RABAN. Went, he says, because he was neither compelled, nor invited, but of his own free will formed the wicked design.
CHRYS. One of the twelve, as much as to say, of that first band who are elected for preeminent merit.
GLOSS. He adds his distinctive appellation, Scarioth, for there was another' Judas.
REMIG. So called from the village Scariotha, from which he came.
LEO; He did not out of any fear forsake Christ, but through lust of
money cast Him off; for in comparison; of the love of money all our
affections are feeble; the soul athirst for gain fears not to die for a
very little; there is no trace of righteousness in that heart in which
covetousness has once taken up its abode. The traitor Judas,
intoxicated with this bane, in his thirst for lucre was so foolishly
hardened, as to sell his Lord and Master.
JEROME; The wretched Judas would fain replace, by the sale of his
Master, that loss which he supposed he had incurred by the ointment.
And he does not demand any fixed sum, lest his treachery should seem a
gainful thing, but as though delivering up a worthless slave, he left
it to those who bought, to determine how much they would give.
ORIGEN; The same do all who take any material or worldly things to cast
out of their thoughts the Savior and the word of truth which was in
them. And they covenanted with him for thirty pieces of silver, as many
pieces as the Savior had dwelt years in the world.
JEROME; Joseph was not sold as many, following the LXX, think for
twenty pieces of gold, but as the Hebrew text has for twenty pieces of
silver, for it could not be that the servant should be more valuable
than his Master.
AUG. That the Lord was sold for thirty pieces of silver by Judas,
denotes the unrighteous Jews, who pursuing things carnal and temporal,
which belong to the five bodily senses, refuse to have Christ; and
forasmuch as they did this in the sixth age of the world, their
receiving five times six as the price of the Lord is thus signified;
and because the Lord's words are silver, but they understood even the
Law carnally, they had, as it were, stamped on silver the image of that
worldly dominion which they held to when they renounced the Lord.
ORIGEN; The opportunity which Judas sought is further explained by
Luke, how he might betray him in the absence of the multitude; when the
populace was not with Him but He was withdrawn with His disciples. And
this he did, delivering Him up after supper, when He was withdrawn to
the garden of Gethsemane. And from that time forward, such has been the
season sought for by those that would betray the word of God in time of
persecution, when the multitude of believers is not around the word of
truth.
17. Now the first day of the feast of unleavened bread the
disciples came to Jesus, saying to him, Where will you that we prepare
for you to eat the Passover?
18. And he said, Go into the city to such a man, and say to him, The
Master says, My time is at hand; I will keep the Passover at your house
with my disciples.
19. And the disciples did as Jesus had appointed them; and they made ready the Passover.
GLOSS. The Evangelist having gone through the events preliminary to the
Passion, namely, the announcement of it, the counsel of the Chief
Priests, and the covenant for His betrayal, prosecutes the history in
the order of events, saying, On the first day of unleavened bread.
JEROME; The first day of unleavened bread is the fourteenth day of the
first month, when the lamb is killed, the moon is at full, and leaven
is put away.
REMIG. And observe that with the Jews, the Passover is celebrated on
the first day, and the following seven are called the days of
unleavened bread; but here the first day of unleavened bread means the
day of the Passover.
CHRYS. Or, by the first day, he means the day before the days of
unleavened bread. For the Jews always reckoned the day from the
evening; and this day of which he speaks was that on the evening of
which they were to kill the Passover, namely, the fifth day of the
weeks.
REMIG. But perhaps some one will say, If that typical lamb bore a type
of this the true lamb, how did not Christ suffer on the night on which
this was always killed? It is to be noted, that on this night, He
committed to His disciples the mysteries of His flesh and blood to be
celebrated, and then also being seized and bound by the Jews, He
hallowed the commencement of His sacrifice, i.e. His Passion. The
disciples came to him, among these no doubt was the traitor Judas.
CHRYS. Hence it is evident that He had neither house nor lodging. Nor,
I conclude, had the disciples any, for they would surely have invited
Him thither.
AUG. Go into the city to such a man, Him whom Mark and Luke call the
good-man of the house, or the master of the house. And when Matthew
says, to such a man, he is to be understood to say this as from himself
for brevity's sake; for every one knows that no man speaks thus, Go you
to such a man. And Matthew adds these words, to such a man, not that
the Lord used the very expression, but to convey to us that the
disciples were not sent to any one in the city, but to some certain
person.
CHRYS. Or, we may say that this, to such a man, shows that He sent them
to some person unknown to them, teaching them thereby that He was able
to avoid His Passion. For He who prevailed with this man to entertain
Him, how could He not have prevailed with those who crucified Him, had
He chosen not to suffer? Indeed, I marvel not only that he entertained
Him, being a stranger, but that he did it in contempt of the hatred of
the multitude.
HILARY; Or, Matthew does not name the man in whose house Christ would
celebrate the Passover, because the Christian name was not yet held in
honor by the believers.
RABAN. Or, he omits the name, that all who would fain celebrate the
true Passover, and receive Christ within the dwelling place of their
own minds, should understand that the opportunity is afforded them
JEROME; In this also the New Scripture observes the practice of the
Old, in which we frequently read, 'He said unto him,' and 'In this or
that place,' without any name of person or place.
CHRYS. My time is at hand, this He said, both by so manifold
announcements of His Passion, fortifying His disciples against the
event, and at the same time showing that He undertook it voluntarily. I
will keep the Passover at your house, wherein we see, that to the very
last day He was not disobedient to the Law. With my disciples, He adds,
that there might be sufficient preparation made, and that he to whom He
sent might not think that He desired to be concealed.
ORIGEN; Some one may argue, that because Jesus kept the Passover with
Jewish observances, we ought to do the same as followers of Christ, not
remembering that Jesus was made under the Law, though not that He
should leave under the Law those who were under it, but should lead
them out of it; how much less fitting then is it, that those who before
were without the Law, should afterwards enter in? We celebrate
spiritually the things which were carnally celebrated in the Law,
keeping the Passover in the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth,
according to the will of the Lamb, who said, Except you eat my flesh
and drink my blood, you shall not have life in you.
20. Now when the even was come, he sat down with the twelve.
21. And as they did eat, he said, Verily I say to you, that one of you shall betray me.
22. And they were exceeding sorrowful, and began every one of them to say to him, Lord, is it I?
23. And he answered and said, He that dips his hand with me in the dish, the same shall betray me.
24. The Son of man goes as it is written of him: but woe to that man by
whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he
had not been born.
25. Then Judas, which betrayed him, answered and said, Master, is it I? He said to him, You have said.
; The Lord had above foretold His Passion, He now foretell who is to be
the traitor; thus giving him place of repentance, when he should see
that his thoughts and the secret designs of his heart were known.
REMIG. With the twelve, it is said, for Judas was personally among them, though he had ceased to be so in merit.
JEROME; Judas acts in every thing to remove all suspicion of his treachery.
REMIG. And it is beautifully said, When evening was come, because it was in the evening that the Lamb was wont to be slain.
RABAN. For this reason also, because in Christ's Passion, wherein the
true sun hastened to his setting, eternal refreshment was made ready
for all believers.
CHRYS. The Evangelist relates how as they sat at meat, Jesus declares
Judas' treachery, that the wickedness of the betrayer may be more
apparent from the season and the circumstances.
LEO; He shows that the conscience of His betrayer was known to Him, not
meeting his wickedness with a harsh and open rebuke, that penitence
might find a readier way to one who had not been disgraced by public
dismissal.
ORIGEN; Or, He spoke generally, to prove the nature of each of their
hearts, and to evince the wickedness of Judas, who would not believe in
One who knew his heart. I suppose that at first he supposed that the
thing was hid from Him, deeming Him man, which was of unbelief; but
when he saw that his heart was known, he embraced the concealment
offered by this general way of speaking, which was shamelessness. This
also shows the goodness of the disciples, that they believed Christ's
words more than their own consciences, they began each to say, Lord, is
it I? For they knew by what Jesus had taught them that human nature is
readily turned to evil, and is in continual struggle with the rulers of
the darkness of this world; whence they ask as in fear, for by reason
of our weakness the future is an object of dread to us. When the Lord
saw the disciples thus alarmed for themselves, He pointed out the
traitor by the mark of the prophetic declaration, He that has eaten
bread with me has wantonly overthrown me.
JEROME; O wonderful endurance of the Lord, He had said before, One of
you shall betray me. The traitor perseveres in his wickedness; He
designates him more particularly, yet not by name. For Judas, while the
rest were sorrowful, and withdrew their hands and bid away the food
from their mouths, with the same hardihood and recklessness which led
him to betray Him reached forth his hand into the dish with his Master,
passing off his audacity as a good conscience.
CHRYS. I rather think that Christ did this out of regard for him, and to bring him to a better mind.
RABAN. What Matthew calls 'paropsis,' Mark calls 'catinus.' The
'paropsis' is a square dish for meat, 'catinus,' an earthen vessel for
containing fluids; this then might be a square earthen vessel.
ORIGEN; Such is the wont of men of exceeding wickedness, to plot
against those of whose bread and salt they have partaken, and
especially those who have no enmity against them. But if we take it of
the spiritual table, and the spiritual food, we shall see the more
abundant and overthrowing measure of this man's wickedness, who called
to mind neither his Master's love in providing carnal goods, nor His
teaching in things spiritual. Such are all in the Church who lay snares
for their brethren whom they continually meet at the same table of
Christ's Body.
JEROME; Judas, not withheld by either the first or second warning,
perseveres in his treachery; the Lord's long-suffering nourishes his
audacity. Now then his punishment is foretold, that denunciations of
wrath may correct where good feeling has no power.
REMIG. It belongs to human nature to come and go, Divine nature remains
ever the same. So because His human nature could suffer and die,
therefore of the Son of Man it is well said that he goes. He says
plainly, As it is written of him, for all that He suffered had been
foretold by the Prophets.
CHRYS. This He said to comfort His disciples, that they might not think
that it was through weakness that He suffered; and at the same time for
the correction of His betrayer. And notwithstanding His Passion had
been foretold, Judas is still guilty; and not his betrayal wrought our
salvation, but God's providence, which used the sins of others to our
profit.
ORIGEN; He said not, By whom the Son of Man is betrayed, but through
whom, pointing out another, to wit, the Devil, as the author of His
betrayal, Judas as the minister. But woe also to all betrayers of
Christ! and such is every one who betrays a disciple of Christ.
REMIG. Woe also to all who draw near to Christ's table with an evil and
defiled conscience! who though they do not deliver Christ to the Jews
to be crucified, deliver Him to their own sinful members to be taken.
He adds, to give more emphasis, Good were it for that man if he had
never been born.
JEROME; We are not to infer from this that man has a being before
birth; for it cannot be well with any man till he has a being; it
simply implies that it is better not to be, than to be in evil.
AUG. And if it be contended that there is a life before this life, that
will prove that not only not for Judas, but for none other is it good
to have been born. Can it mean, that it were better for him not to have
been born to the Devil, namely, for sin? Or does it mean that it had
been good for him not to have been born to Christ at his calling, that
he should now become apostate?
ORIGEN; After all the Apostles had asked, and after Christ had spoken
of him, Judas at length inquired of himself, with the crafty design of
concealing his treacherous purpose by asking the same question as the
rest; for real sorrow brooks not suspense.
JEROME; His question feigns either great respect, or a hypocritical
incredulousness. The rest who were not to betray Him, said only Lord;
the actual traitor addresses Him as Master, as though it were some
excuse that he denied Him as Lord, and betrayed a Master only.
ORIGEN; Or, out of sycophancy he calls Him Master, while he holds Him unworthy of the title.
CHRYS. Though the Lord could have said, Have you covenanted to receive
silver, and dare to ask Me this? But Jesus, most merciful, said nothing
of all this, therein laying down for us rules and landmarks of
endurance of evil. He said to him, you have said.
REMIG. Which may be understood thus; You say it, and you say what is
true; or, You have said this, not I; leaving him room for repentance so
long as his villainy was not publicly exposed.
RABAN. This might have been so said by Judas, and answered by the Lord as not to be overheard by the rest.
26. And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it,
and broke it, and gave it to the disciples and said, Take, eat; this is
my body.
JEROME; When the typical Passover was concluded, and He had partaken of
the Lamb with His Apostles, He comes to the true paschal sacrament;
that, as Melchisedech, Priest of the most high God, had done in
foreshadowing Christ, offering bread and wine, He also should offer the
present verity of His Body and Blood.
AUG. And as they were eating, whereby it is clearly seen that at their
first partaking of the Lord's Body and Blood, the disciples did not
partake fasting. But are we therefore to except against the practice of
the whole Church, of receiving fasting; It has seemed good to the Holy
Ghost, that for the better honor of so great a Sacrament, the Lord's
Body should enter the Christian's mouth before other food. For to
commend more mightily the depth of this mystery, the Savior chose this
as the last thing He would imprint on the hearts and memory of His
disciples, from whom He was to depart to His Passion. But He did not
direct in what order it should thenceforth be taken, that He might
reserve that for the Apostles by whom He would regulate His Church.
GLOSS. Christ delivered to us His Flesh and Blood under another kind,
and ordained them to be thenceforth so received, that faith might have
its merit, which is of things that are not seen.
AMBROSE; And that we might not be shocked by the sight of blood, while it at the same time wrought the price of our redemption.
AUG. The Lord committed His Body and Blood to substances which are
formed a homogeneous compound out of many. Bread is made of many
grains, wine is produced out of many berries. Herein the Lord Jesus
Christ signified us, and hallowed in His own table the mystery of our
peace and unity.
REMIG. Fittingly also did He offer fruit of the earth, to show thereby
that He came to take away the curse wherewith the earth was cursed for
the sin of the first man. Also He bade be offered the produce of the
earth, and the things for which men chiefly toil, that there might be
no difficulty in procuring them, and that men might offer sacrifice to
God of the work of their hands.
AMBROSE; Hence learn that the Christian mysteries were before the
Jewish. Melchisedech offered bread and; wine, being in all things like
the Son of God, to Whom it is said, You are a Priest for ever after the
order of Melchisedech; and of Whom it is here said, Jesus took bread.
GLOSS. This we must understand to be wheat bread, for the Lord compared
Himself to a grain of wheat, saying, Except a corn fall into the ground
&c. Such bread also is suitable for the Sacrament, because it is in
common use; bread of other kinds being only made when this fails. But
forasmuch as Christ up to the very last day, to use the words of
Chrysostom as above, showed that He did nothing contrary to the Law,
and the Law commanded that unleavened bread should be eaten in the
evening when the Passover was slain, and that all leavened should be
put away, it is manifest that the bread which the Lord c took and gave
to His disciples was unleavened.
GREG. It has given trouble to divers persons, that in the Church some
offer unleavened and others leavened bread. The Roman Church offers
unleavened, because the Lord took flesh without any pollution; other
Churches offer leavened bread, because the Word of the Father took
flesh upon Him, and is Very God, and Very Man; and so the leaven is
mingled with the flour. But whether we e receive leavened or
unleavened, we are made one body of the Lord our Savior.
AMBROSE; This bread before the sacramentary words, is the bread in
common use; after consecration it is made of bread Christ's flesh. And
what are the words, or whose are the phrases of consecration, save
those of the Lord Jesus? For if His word had power to make those things
begin to be which were not, how much rather will it not be efficacious
to cause them to remain what they are, while they are at the same time
changed into somewhat else. For if the heavenly word has been effectual
in other matters is it ineffectual in heavenly sacraments? Therefore of
the bread is made the Body of Christ, and the wine is made blood by the
consecration of the heavenly word. Do you inquire after the manner?
Learn. The course of nature is, that a man is not born but of man and
woman, but by God's will Christ was born of the Holy Spirit and a
Virgin.
PASCHASIUS; As then real flesh was created by the Holy Spirit without
sexual union, so by the same Holy Spirit the substance of bread and
wine are consecrated into the Body and Blood of Christ. And because
this consecration is made by the Lord's word, it is added, He blessed
it.
REMIG. Hereby He showed also that He together with the Father and the
Holy Spirit has filled human nature with the grace of His divine power,
and enriched it with the boon of immortality. And to show that His Body
was not subject to passion but of His own will, it is added, And broke.
LANFRANC; When the host is broken, when the blood is poured from the
cup into the mouth of the faithful, what else is denoted but the
offering of the Lord's Body on the cross, and the shedding of His Blood
out of His side?
DIONYSIUS; In this is also shown, that the one and uncompounded Word of
God came to us compounded and visible by taking human in nature upon
Him, and drawing to Himself our society, made us partakers of the
spiritual goods which He distributed, as it follows, And gave to his
disciples.
LEO; Not excluding the traitor even from this mystery, that it might be
made manifest that Judas was provoked by no wrong, but that he had been
foreknown in voluntary impiety.
AUG. Peter and Judas received of the same bread, but Peter to life, Judas to death.
CHRYS. And this John shows when he says, After the sop, Satan entered
into him. For his sin was aggravated in that he came near to these
mysteries with such a heart, and that having come to them, he was made
better neither by fear, kindness, nor honor. Christ hindered him not,
though He knew all things, that you may learn that He omits nothing
which serves for correction.
REMIG. In so doing He left an example to the Church, that it should
sever no one from its fellowship, or from the communion of the Body and
Blood of the Lord, but for some notorious and public crime.
HILARY; Or, The Passover was concluded by the taking the cup and
breaking the bread without Judas, for he was unworthy the communion of
eternal sacraments. And that he had left them we learn from thence,
that he returns with a multitude.
AUG. And said, Take, eat; The Lord invites His servants to set before
them Himself for food. But who would dare to eat his Lord; This food
when eaten refreshes, but fails not; He lives after being eaten, Who
rose again after being put to death. Neither when we eat Him do we
divide His substance; but thus it is in this Sacrament. The faithful
know how they feed on Christ's flesh, each man receives a part for
himself. He is divided into parts in the Sacrament, yet He remains
whole; He is all in heaven, He is all in your heart. They are called
Sacraments, because in them what is seen is one thing, what is
understood is another, what is seen has a material form, what is
understood has spiritual fruit.
ID. Let us not eat Christ's flesh only in the Sacrament, for that do
many wicked men, but let us eat to spiritual participation, that we may
abide as members in the Lord's body, that we may be quickened by His
Spirit.
AMBROSE; Before consecration, it is bread; after Christ's words, This is my body, have been pronounced, it is Christ's Body.
27. And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink you all of it;
28. For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
29. But I say to you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the
vine, until that day when drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom.
REMIG. The Lord having given His disciples His Body under the element
of bread, well gives the cup of His Blood to them likewise; showing
what joy He has in our salvation, seeing He even shed His Blood for us.
CHRYS. He gave thanks to instruct us after what manner we ought to
celebrate this mystery, and showed also thereby that He came not to His
Passion against His will. Also He taught us to bear whatever we suffer
with thanksgiving, and infused into us good hopes. For if the type of
this sacrifice, to wit, the offering of the paschal lamb, became the
deliverance of the people from Egyptian bondage, much more shall the
reality thereof be the deliverance of the world. And gave it to them,
saying, Drink you all of it. That they should not be distressed at
hearing this, He first drank His own blood to lead them without fear to
the communion of these mysteries.
JEROME; Thus then the Lord Jesus Hi was at once guest and feast, the eater and the things eaten.
CHRYS. This is my blood of the new testament; that is, the new promise,
covenant, law; for this blood was promised from of old, and this
guarantees the new covenant; for as the Old Testament had the blood of
sheep and goats, so the New has the Lord's Blood.
REMIG. For thus it is read, Behold the blood of the covenant which the Lord has made with you.
CHRYS. And in calling it blood, He foreshadows His Passion, My blood. .
. which shall be shed for many. Also the purpose for which He died,
adding, For the remission of sins; as much as to say, The blood of the
lamb was shed in Egypt for the salvation of the first born of the
Israelites, this My Blood is shed for the remission of sins.
REMIG. And it is to be noted, that He says not, For a few, nor, For
all, but, For many; because He came not to redeem a single nation, but
many out of all nations.
CHRYS. Thus saying, He shows that His Passion is a mystery of the
salvation of men, by which also He comforts His disciples. And as Moses
said, This shall be an ordinance to you for ever, so Christ speaks as
Luke relates, Do this in remembrance of me.
REMIG. And He taught us to offer not bread only, but wine also, to show
that they who hungered and thirsted after righteousness were to be
refreshed by these mysteries.
GLOSS. As the refreshment of the body is wrought by means of meat and
drink, so under the form of meat and drink the Lord has provided for us
spiritual refreshment. And it was suitable that for the showing forth
the Lord's Passion this Sacrament should be instituted under both
kinds. For in His Passion He shed His Blood, and so His Blood was
separated from His Body. It is necessary therefore, that for
representation of His Passion, bread and wine should be separately set
forth, which are the Sacrament of the Body and Blood. But it should be
known, that under both kinds the whole of Christ is contained; under
the bread is contained the Blood, together with the Body; under the
wine, the Body together with the Blood.
AMBROSIAST. And for this reason also do we celebrate under both kinds,
because that which we receive avails for the preservation of both body
and soul.
CYPRIAN; The cup of the Lord is not water only, or wine only, but the
two are mixed; so the Lord's Body cannot be either flour only, or water
only, but the two are combined.
AMBROSE; If Melchisedech offered bread and wine, what means this mixing
of water? Hear the reason. Moses struck the rock, and the rock gave
forth abundance of water, but that rock was Christ; Also one of the
soldiers with his spear pierced Christ's side, and out of His side
flowed water and blood, the water to cleanse, the blood to redeem.
REMIG. For it should be known, that as John speaks, The many waters are
nations and people. And because we ought always to abide in Christ and
Christ in us, wine mixed with water is offered, to show that the head
and the members, that is, Christ and the Church, are one body; or to
show that neither did Christ suffer without a love for our redemption,
nor we can be saved without His Passion.
CHRYS. And having spoken of His Passion and Cross, He proceeds to speak
of His resurrection, I say to you, I will not drink henceforth, &c.
By the kingdom He means His resurrection. And He speaks this of His
resurrection, because He would then drink with the Apostles, that none
might suppose His resurrection a fantasy. Thus when they would convince
any of His resurrection, they said, We did eat and drink with Him after
He rose from the dead. This tells them that they shall see Him after He
is risen, and that He will be again with them. That He says, New, is
plainly to be understood, after a new manner, He no longer having a
passible body, or needing food. For after His resurrection He did not
eat as needing food, but to evidence the reality of the resurrection.
And forasmuch as there are some heretics who use water instead of wine
in the sacred mysteries, He shows in these words, that when He now gave
them these holy mysteries, He gave them wine, and drank the like after
He was risen; for He says, Of this fruit of the vine, but the vine
produces wine, and not water.
JEROME; Or otherwise; From carnal things the Lord passes to spiritual.
Holy Scripture speaks of the people of Israel as of a vine brought up
out of Egypt; of this vine it is then that the Lord says He will drink
no more except in His Father's kingdom. His Father's kingdom I suppose
to mean the faith of the believers. When then the Jews shall receive
His Father's kingdom, then the Lord will drink of their vine. Observe
that He says, Of my Father, not, Of God, for to name the Father is to
name the Son. As much as to say, When they shall have believed on God
the Father, and He has brought them to the Son.
REMIG. Or otherwise; I will not drink of the fruit of this vine, i.e. I
will no longer take pleasure in the carnal oblations of the Synagogue,
among which the immolation of the Paschal lamb held an eminent place.
But the time of My resurrection is at hand, and the day in which
exalted in the Father's kingdom, that is, raised in immortal glory, I
shall drink it new with you, i.e. I shall rejoice as With a new joy in
the salvation of that people then renewed by the water of baptism.
AUG. Or otherwise; When He says, I shall drink it new with you, He
gives us to understand that this is old. Seeing then that He took body
of the race of Adam, who is called the old man, and was to give up to
death that Body in His Passion, (whence also He gave us His Blood in
the sacrament of wine,) what else can we understand by the new wine
than the immortality of renewed bodies. In saying, I will drink it with
you, He promises to them likewise a resurrection of their bodies for
the putting on of immortality. With you is not to be understood of
time, but of a like renewal, as the Apostle speaks, that we are risen
with Christ, the hope of the future bringing a present joy. That that
which He shall drink new shall also be of this fruit of the vine,
signifies that the very same bodies shall rise after the heavenly
renewal, which shall now die after the earthly decay.
HILARY; It seems from this that Judas had not drunk with Him because He
was not to drink hereafter in the kingdom; but He promises to all who
partook at this time of this fruit of the vine that they should drink
with Him hereafter.
GLOSS. But in support of the opinion of other saints, that Judas did
receive the sacraments from Christ, it is to be said, that the words
with you may refer to the greater part of them, and not necessarily to
the whole.
30. And when they had sung a hymn, they went out into the mount of Olives.
31. Then said Jesus to them, All you shall be offended because of me
this night; for it is written I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep
of the flock shall be scattered abroad.
32. But after I am risen again, I will go before you into Galilee.
33. Peter answered and said to him, Though all men shall be offended because of you, yet will I never be offended.
34. Jesus said to him, Verily I say to you, That this night, before the cock crow, you shall deny me thrice.
35. Peter said to him, Though I should die with you, yet will I not deny you. Likewise also said all the disciples.
When the disciples had eaten the bread of blessing, and drunk of the
cup of thanksgiving, the Lord instructs them in return for these things
to sing a hymn to the Father. And they go to the Mount of Olives, that
they may pass from height to height, because the believer can do
nothing in the valley.
BEDE; Beautifully after the disciples have been filled with the
Sacraments of His Body and Blood, and commended to the Father in a hymn
of pious intercession, does He lead them into the mount of Olives; thus
by type teaching us how we ought, by the working of His Sacraments, and
the aid of His intercession, mount up to the higher gifts of the
virtues and the graces of the Holy Spirit, with which we are anointed
in our hearts.
RABAN. This hymn may be that thanksgiving which in John, Our Lord
offers up to the Father, when He lifted up His eyes and prayed for His
disciples, and those who should believe through their word. This is
that of which the Psalm speaks, The poor shall eat and be filled, they
shall praise the Lord.
CHRYS. Let them hear this, who like swine with no thought but of eating
rise from the table drunk, when they should have given thanks, and
closed with a hymn. Let then hear who will not tarry for the final
prayer in the sacred mysteries; for the last prayer of the mysteries
represents that hymn. He gave thanks before He delivered the holy
mysteries to the disciples, that we also might give thanks; He sung a
hymn after He had delivered them, that we also should do the like.
JEROME; After this example of the Savior, whoever is filled and is
drunken upon the bread and cup of Christ, may praise God and ascend the
Mount of Olives, where is refreshment after toil, solace of grief, and
knowledge of the true light.
HILARY; Hereby He shows that men confirmed by the powers of the Divine
mysteries, are exalted to heavenly glory in a common joy and gladness.
ORIGEN ; Suitably also was the mount of mercy chosen whence to declare
the offense of His disciples' weakness, by One even then prepared not
to reject the disciples who forsook Him, but to receive them when they
returned to Him.
He foretells what they should suffer, that they might not after it had
befallen them despair of salvation; but doing penitence might be set
free.
CHRYS. In this we see what the disciples were both before and after the
cross. They who could not stand with Christ whilst He was crucified,
became after the death of Christ harder than adamant. This flight and
fear of the disciples is a demonstration of Christ's death against
those who are infected with the heresy of Marcion. If He had been
neither bound nor crucified, whence arose the terror of Peter and the
rest?
JEROME; And He adds emphatically this night, because as they that are
drunken are drunken by night so they that are scandalized are
scandalized by night, and in the dark.
HILARY; The credit of this prediction is supported by the authority of
old prophecy; It is written I will smite the shepherd and the sheep of
the flock shall all be scattered abroad.
JEROME; This is found in Zacharias in words different; it is said to
God in the person of the Prophet, Smite the shepherd, and the sheep
will be scattered abroad. The good Shepherd is smitten, that He may lay
down His life for His sheep, and that of many flocks of divers errors
should be made one flock, and one Shepherd.
He produces this prophecy to teach them to attend to the things that
are written, and to show that His crucifixion was according to the
counsel of God, and (as He does throughout) that He was not a stranger
to the Old Testament, but that it prophesied of Him. But He did not
suffer them to continue in sorrow, but announces glad tidings, saying,
When I am risen again, I will go before you into Galilee. After His
resurrection He does not appear to them immediately from heaven, nor
depart into any far country, but in the very same nation in which He
was crucified, almost in the very place, giving them thereby assurance,
that He who was crucified was the same as He who rose again, thereby to
cheer their cast-down countenances. He fixes upon Galilee, that, being
delivered from fear of the Jews, they might believe what He spoke to
them.
ORIGEN; Also He foretell this to them, that they who now were somewhat
dispersed in consequence of the offense, should be after gathered
together by Christ rising again, and going before them into Galilee of
the Gentiles.
But Peter was carried so far by his zeal and affection for Christ, that
he regarded neither the weakness of his flesh nor the truth of the
Lord's words; as if what He spoke must not come to pass, Peter answered
and said to him, Though all should be offended because of you, yet will
I never be offended.
CHRYS. What say you, Peter? The Prophet says, The sheep shall be
scattered abroad, and Christ has confirmed it, yet you say, Never. When
He said, One of you shall betray me, you feared for yourself, although
you were not conscious of such a thought; now when He openly affirms,
All you shall be offended, you deny it. But because when he was
relieved of the anxiety he had concerning the betrayal, he grew
confident concerning the rest, he therefore says thus, I will never be
offended.
JEROME; It is not willfulness, not falsehood, but the Apostle's faith, and ardent attachment towards the Lord his Savior.
REMIG. What the One affirms by His power of foreknowledge, the other
denies through love; whence we may take a practical lesson, that in
proportion as we are confident of the warmth of our faith, we should be
in fear of the weakness of our flesh. Peter seems culpable, first,
because he contradicted the Lord's words; secondly, because he set
himself before the rest; and thirdly, because he attributed every thing
to himself as though he had power to persevere strenuously. His fall
then was permitted to heal this in him; not that he was driven to deny,
but left to himself, and so convinced of the frailty of his human
nature.
Whence the other disciples were offended in Jesus, but Peter was not
only offended, but what is much more, was suffered to deny Him thrice.
AUG. Perplexity may be occasioned to some by the great difference, not
in words only, but in substance, of the speeches in which Peter is
forewarned by Our Lord, and which occasion his presumptuous declaration
of dying with or for the Lord. Some would oblige us to understand that
he thrice expressed his confidence, and the Lord thrice answered him
that he would deny Him thrice before cock-crowing; as after His
resurrection He thrice asked him if he loved Him, and as often gave him
command to feed His sheep. For what in language or matter has Matthew
like the expressions of Peter in either Luke or John? Mark indeed
relates it in nearly the same words as Matthew, only marking more
precisely in the Lord's words the manner in which it should fall in,
Verily I say to you, that this day, in the night, before the cock crow
twice, you shall deny me thrice. Whence some inattentive persons think
that there is a discrepancy between Mark and the rest. For the sum of
Peter's denials is three if the first then had been after the first
cock-crowing, the other three Evangelists must be wrong when they make
the Lord say that Peter should deny Him before the cock crow. But, on
the other hand, if he had made all three denials before the cock began
to crow, it would be superfluous in Mark to say, Before the cock crows
twice. Forasmuch as this threefold denial was begun before the first
cockcrow, the three Evangelists have marked, not when it was to be
concluded, but how often it was to happen, and when to begin, that is,
before cock-crow. Though indeed if we understand it of Peter's heart we
may well say, that the whole denial was complete before the first
cock-crow, seeing that before that his mind was seized with that great
fear which wrought upon him to the third denial. Much less therefore
ought it to disquiet us, how the three-fold denial in three distinct
speeches was begun, but not finished before cockcrow. Just as though
one should say, Before cock-crow you will write me a letter, in which
you will revile me three times; if the letter were begun before any
cock crow, but not finished till after the first, we should not
therefore say that the prediction was false.
But you will ask, whether it were possible that Peter should not have
been offended, when once the Savior had said, All you shall be offended
in me. To which one will answer, what is foretold by Jesus must of
necessity come to pass; and another will say, that He who at the prayer
of Ninevites turned away the wrath He had denounced by Jonas, might
also have averted Peter's offense at his entreaty. But his presumptuous
confidence, prompted by zeal indeed but not a cautious zeal, became the
cause not only of offense but of a thrice repeated denial. And since He
confirmed it with the sanction of an oath, some one will say that it
was not possible that he should not have denied Him. For Christ would
have spoken falsely when he said, Verily I say to you, if Peter's
assertion, I will not deny you, had been true. It seems to me that the
other disciples having in view not that which was first said, All you
shall be offended, but that which was said to Peter, Verily I say to
you, &c. made a like promise with Peter because they were not
comprehended in the prophecy of denial. Peter said to him, Though I
should die with you, yet will I not deny you. Likewise also said all
the disciples. Here again Peter knows not what he says; he could not
die with Him who was to die for all mankind, who were all in sin, and
had need of some one to die for them, not that they should die for
others.
RABAN. Peter understood the Lord to have foretold that he should deny
Him under terror of death, and therefore he declares that though death
were imminent, nothing could shake him from his faith; and the other
Apostles in like manner in the warmth of their zeal, valued not the
infliction of death, but human presumption is vain without Divine aid.
CHRYS. I suppose also that Peter fell into these words through ambition
and boastfulness. And they had disputed at supper which of them should
be greatest, whence we see that the love of empty glory disturbed them
much. And so to deliver him from such passions, Christ withdrew His aid
from him. Moreover observe how after the resurrection, taught by his
fall he speaks to Christ more humbly, and does not any more resist His
words. All this his fall wrought for him; for before he had attributed
all to himself, when he ought rather to have said, I will not deny You
if You succor me with Your aid. But afterwards he shows that every
thing is to be ascribed to God; Why look you so earnestly upon us, as
though by our own power and holiness we had made this man to walk?
Hence then we learn the great doctrine, that man's wish is not enough,
unless he enjoys Divine support.
36. Then comes Jesus with them to a place called Gethsemane, and
said to the disciples, Sit you here, while I go and pray yonder.
37. And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy.
38. Then said he to them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even to death: tarry you here and watch with me.
REMIG. The Evangelist had said a little above, that when they had sung
a hymn they went out to the mount of Olives; to point out the part of
the mount to which they took their way, he now adds, Then came Jesus
with them to a garden called Gethsemane.
RABAN. Luke says, To the mount of Olives, and John, Went forth over the
brook Cedron, where was a garden, which is the same as this Gethsemane,
and is a place where He prayed at the foot of mount Olivet, where is a
garden, and a Church now built.
JEROME; Gethsemane is interpreted, 'The rich valley;' and there He bade
His disciples sit a little while, and wait His return whilst He prayed
alone for all.
ORIGEN; For it was not fitting that He should be seized in the place
where He had sat and eaten the Passover with His disciples. Also He
must first pray, and choose a place pure for prayer.
CHRYS. He says, Sit you here, while I go and pray yonder, because the
disciples adhered inseparably to Christ; but it was His practice to
pray apart from them, therein teaching us to study quiet and retirement
for our prayers.
DAMASCENUS; But seeing that prayer is the sending up the understanding
to God, or the asking of God things fitting, how did the Lord pray? For
His understanding needed not to be lifted up to God, having been once
united hypostatically to God the Word. Neither could He need to ask of
God things fitting, for the One Christ is both God and Man. But giving
in Himself a pattern to us, He taught us to ask of God, and to lift up
our minds to Him. As He took on Him our passions, that by triumphing
over them Himself, He might give us also the victory over them, so now
He prays to open to us the way to that lifting up to God, to fulfill
for us all righteousness, to reconcile His Father to us, to pay honor
to Him as the First Cause, and to show that He is not against God.
RABAN. When the Lord prayed in the mountain, He taught us to make
supplication for heavenly things; when He prays in the garden, He
teaches us to study humility in our prayer. And beautifully, as He
draws near His Passion, does He pray in the 'valley of fatness,'
showing that through the valley of humility, and the richness of
charity, He took upon Him death for our sakes. The practical
instruction which we may also learn from this is, that we should not
suffer our heart to dry up from the richness of charity.
REMIG. He had accepted the disciples' faith and the devotedness of
their will, but He foresaw that they would be troubled and scattered
abroad, and therefore bade them sit still in their places; for to sit
belongs to one at ease, but they would be grievously troubled that they
should have denied Him. In what fashion He went forward it describes,
And taking with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, he began to be
sorrowful and very heavy; the same to whom He had shown His glory in
the mount.
HILARY; These words, He began to be sorrowful and very heavy, are
interpreted by heretics that fear of death assailed the Son of God,
being (as they allege) neither begotten from eternity, nor existing in
the Father's infinite substance, but produced out of nothing by Him who
created all things; and that hence He was liable to anguish of grief,
and fear of death. And He who can fear death can also die; and He who
can die, though He shall exist after death, yet is not eternal through
Him who begot Him in past time. Had these faith to receive the Gospels,
they would know that the Word was in the beginning God, and from the
beginning with God, and that the eternity of Him who begets and Him who
is begotten is one and the same. But if the assumption of flesh
infected with its natural infirmity the virtue of that incorruptible
substance, so that it became subject to pain, and shrinking from death,
it would also become thereby liable to corruption, and thus its
immortality being changed into fear, that which is in it is capable of
at some time ceasing to be. But God ever is without measure of time,
and such as He is, He continues to be eternally. Nothing then in God
can die, nor can God have any fear springing out of Himself.
JEROME; But we say that passible man was so taken by God the Son, that
His Deity remained impassible. Indeed the Son of God suffered, not by
imputation but actually, all that Scripture testifies, in respect of
that part of Him which could suffer, viz. in respect of the substance
that He had taken on Him.
HILARY; I suppose that there are some who offer here no other cause of
His fear than His passion and death. I ask those who think thus,
whether it stands with reason that He should have feared to die, who
banished from the Apostles all fear of death, and exhorted them to the
glory of martyrdom? How can we suppose Him to have felt pain and grief
in the sacrament of death, who rewards with life those who die for Him?
And what pangs of death could He fear, who came to death of the free
choice of His own power? And if His Passion was to do Him honor, how
could the fear of His Passion make Him sorrowful?
ID. Since then we read that the Lord was sorrowful, let us discover the
causes of His agony. He had forewarned them all that they would be
offended, and Peter that he would thrice deny his Lord; and taking him
and James and John, He began to be sorrowful. Therefore He was not
sorrowful till He took them, but all His fear began after He had taken
them; so that His agony was not for Himself, but for them whom He had
taken.
JEROME; The Lord therefore sorrowed not from fear of suffering, for
this cause He had come that He should suffer and had rebuked Peter for
his fearfulness; but for the wretched Judas, for the offense of the
rest of the Apostles, for the rejection and reprobation of the Jewish
nation, and the overthrow of unhappy Jerusalem.
DAMAS. Or otherwise; All things which have not yet been brought into
existence by their Maker have a natural desire of existence, and
naturally shun non-existence. God the Word then, having been made Man,
had this desire, through which He desired food, drink, and sleep, by
which life is supported, and naturally used them, and contrariwise
shunned the things that are destructive of life. Hence in the season of
His Passion which He endured voluntarily, He had the natural fear and
sorrow for death. For there is a natural fear wherewith the soul
shrinks from separation from the body, by reason of that close sympathy
implanted from the first by the Maker of all things.
JEROME; Our Lord therefore sorrowed to prove the reality of the Man
which He had taken upon Him; but that passion might bear no sway in His
mind, He began to be sorrowful by pro-passion; for it is one thing to
be sorrowful, and another to be very sorrowful.
REMIG. By this place are overthrown the Manicheans, who said that He
took an unreal body; and those also who said that He had not a real
soul, but His Divinity in place of a soul.
AUG. We have the narratives of the Evangelists, by which we know that
Christ was both born of the Blessed Virgin Mary, was seized by the
Jews, scourged, crucified, put to death, and buried in a tomb, all
which cannot be supposed to have taken place without a body, and not
even the maddest will say that these things are to be understood
figuratively, when they are told by men who wrote what they remembered
to have happened. These then are witnesses that He had a body, as those
affections which cannot be without mind prove Him to have had a mind,
and which we read in the accounts of the same Evangelists, that Jesus
wondered, was angry, was sorrowful.
ID. Since then these things are related in the Evangelists, they are
not surely false, but as when He willed He became Man, so likewise when
He willed He took into His human soul these passions for the sake of
adding assurance to the dispensation. We indeed have these passions by
reason of the weakness of our human nature; not so the Lord Jesus,
whose weakness was of power.
DAMAS. Wherefore the passions of our nature were in Christ both by
nature and beyond nature. By nature, because He left His flesh to
suffer their things incidental to it; beyond nature, because these
natural emotions did not in Him precede the will. For in Christ nothing
befell of compulsion, but all was voluntary; with His will He hungered,
with His will He feared, or was sorrowful Here His sorrow is declared,
Then said he to them, My soul is sorrowful even to death.
AMBROSE; He is sorrowful, yet not Himself, but His soul; not His
Wisdom, not His divine Substance, but His soul, for He took upon Him my
soul, and my body.
JEROME; He is sorrowful not because of death, but to death, until He
has set the Apostles free by His Passion. Let those who imagine Jesus
to have taken an irrational soul, say how it is that He is thus
sorrowful, and knows the season of His sorrow for though the brute
animals have sorrow, yet they know neither the causes of it, nor the
time for which it must endure
ORIGEN; Or otherwise; My soul is sorrowful even unto death; as much as
to say, Sorrow is begun in me, but not to endure for ever, but only
till the hour of death; that when I shall die for sin, I shall die also
to all sorrow, whose beginnings only are in me. Tarry you here, and
watch with me; as much as to say, The rest I bade sit yonder as weak,
removing them from this struggle; but you I have brought hither as
being stronger, that you may toil with me in watching and prayer. But
abide you here, that every man may stay in his own rank and station;
since all grace, however great, has its superior.
JEROME; Or the sleep which He would have them forego is not bodily
rest, for which at this critical time there was no room, but mental
torpor, the sleep of unbelief.
39. And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and
prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from
me: nevertheless not as I will, but as you will.
40. And he comes to the disciples, and finds them asleep, and said to Peter, What, could you not watch with me one hour?
41. Watch and pray, that you enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.
42. He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my
Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, your
will be done.
43. And he came and found them asleep again: for their eyes were heavy.
44. And he left them, and went away again, and prayed the third time, saying the same words.
He took with Him the self-confident Peter, and the others' that they
might see Him falling on His face and praying, and might learn not to
think great things, but little things of themselves, and not to be
hasty in promising, but careful in prayer. And therefore, He went
forward a little, not to go far from them, but that He might be near
them in His prayer. Also, He who had said above, Learn of me, for I am
meek and lowly in heart, now commendably humbling Himself, falls on His
face. But He shows His devotion in His prayer, and as beloved and
well-pleasing to His Father, He adds, Not as I will, but as you will,
teaching us that we should pray, not that our own will, but that God's
will, should be done. And as He began to have fear and sorrow, He prays
accordingly that the cup of His Passion may pass from Him, yet not as
He wills, but as His Father wills; wills, that is, not according to His
Divine and impassible Substance, but according to His human and weak
nature. For in taking upon Him the nature of human flesh, He fulfilled
all the properties thereof, that it might be seen that He had flesh not
in appearance only, but in reality. The believer indeed must in the
first instance be willing to incur pain, seeing it leads to death, and
he is a man of flesh; but if it be God's will, he acquiesces because he
is a believer. For as we ought not to be too confident that we may not
seem to make a boast of our own strength; so neither ought we to be
distrustful, lest we should seem to charge God our helper with
weakness. It is to be observed that Mark and Luke write the same, but
John does not introduce this prayer of Jesus', that this cup may pass
from Him, because the first three are rather occupied about Him,
according to His human nature, John according to His divine. Otherwise;
Jesus makes this petition, because He sees what the Jews will suffer
for requiring His death.
JEROME; Whence He says emphatically, This cup, that is, of this people
of the Jews, who, if they shall put Me to death, can have no excuse for
their ignorance, seeing they hive the Law and the Prophets, who speak
of Me.
ORIGEN; Then again considering the benefit that would accrue to the
whole world from His Passion, He says, But not as I will, but as you
will; i.e. If it be possible for all these benefits which shall result
from My Passion to be procured without it, let it pass from Me, and
both the world be saved, and the Jews not be condemned in putting Me to
death. But if the salvation of many cannot be procured without the
destruction of a few, saving Your justice, let it not pass away.
Scripture, in many places, speaks of passion as a cup that is drained;
and it is drained by him, who in testimony suffers whatever is
inflicted upon him. He sheds it, on the contrary, who denies in order
to avoid suffering.
AUG. And that none might think that He limited His Father's power, He
said not, If you can do it, but If it may be or, If it be possible; as
much as to say, If you will. For whatever God wills can be done, as
Luke expresses more plainly; for he says not, If it be possible, but If
you will.
HILARY; Otherwise; He says not, Let this cup pass away from Me, for
that would be the speech of one who feared it; but He prays that it may
pass not so as that He should be passed over, but that when it has
passed from Him, it may go to another. His whole fear then is for those
who were to suffer, and therefore He prays for those who were to suffer
after Him, saying, Let this cup pass from me, i.e. as it is drunk by
Me, so let it be drunk by these, without mistrust, without sense of
pain, without fear of death. He says, If it be possible, because flesh
and blood shrink from these things, and it is hard for human bodies not
to sink beneath their infliction. That He says, Not as I will, but as
you will, He would fain indeed that they should not suffer, lest their
faith should fail in their sufferings, if indeed we might attain to the
glory of our joint inheritance with Him without the hardship of sharing
in His Passion. He says, Not as I will, but as you will, because it is
the Father's will that strength to drink of the cup should pass from
Him to them, that the Devil might be vanquished not so much by Christ
as by His disciples also.
AUG. Christ thus as man shows a certain private human will, in which He
who is our head figures both His own will and ours when He says, Let it
pass from me. For this was His human will choosing something as apart
for Himself. But because as man He would be righteous and guide Himself
by God's will, He adds, Nevertheless not as I will, but as you will; as
much as to say to us, Man, behold yourself in Me, that you can will
somewhat apart of thyself, and though God's will is other, this is
permitted to human frailty.
LEO; This speech of the Head is the health of the whole body, this
saying is instruction to the faithful, animates the confessor, crowns
the martyr. For who could vanquish the hatred of the world, or the
whirlwind of temptations, or the terrors of the persecutors, if Christ
did not in all and for all say to the Father, Your will be done. Let
all the sons of the Church then utter this prayer, that when the
pressure of some mighty temptation lies upon them, they may embrace
endurance of the suffering, disregarding its terrors.
And though Jesus went but a little forward, they could not watch one
hour in His absence; let us therefore pray that Jesus may never depart
even a little from us.
CHRYS. He finds them sleeping, both because it was a late hour of the night, and their eyes were heavy with sorrow.
HILARY; When then He returned to His disciples and found them sleeping,
He rebukes Peter, Could you not watch one hour with me? He addresses
Peter rather than the rest, because he had most loudly boasted that he
would not be offended.
But as they had all said the same, He charges them all with weakness;
they had chosen to die with Christ, and yet could not even watch with
Him.
ORIGEN; Finding them thus sleeping, He rouses them with a word to
hearken, and commands them to watch; Watch and pray, that you enter not
into temptation; that first we should watch, and so watching pray. He
watches who does good works, and is careful that He does not run into
any dark doctrine, for so the prayer of the watchful is heard.
JEROME; It is impossible that the human mind should not be tempted,
therefore He says not Watch and pray that you be not tempted, but that
you enter not into temptation, that is, that temptation vanquish you
not.
HILARY; And why He thus encouraged them to pray that they might not
enter into temptation, He adds, For the spirit indeed is willing, but
the flesh is weak; this He says not of Himself, but addresses them.
JEROME; This is against those rash persons who think that whatever they
believe they can perform. The more confident we are of our zeal, the
more mistrustful should we be of the frailty of the flesh.
ORIGEN; Here it should be inquired, whether as all men's flesh is weak,
so all men's spirit is willing, or whether only that of the saints; and
whether in unbelievers the spirit is not also dull, as the flesh is
weak. In another sense the flesh of those only is weak whose spirit is
willing, and who with their willing spirit do mortify the deeds of the
flesh. These then He would have watch and pray that they should not
enter into temptation, for the more spiritual any one may be, the more
careful should he be that his goodness should not suffer a great fall.
REMIG. Otherwise; In these words He shows that He took real flesh of
the Virgin, and had a real soul, saying that His spirit is willing to
suffer, but His flesh weak in fearing the pain of Passion.
ORIGEN; There were, I conclude, two ways in which this cup of Passion
might pass from the Lord. If He should drink it, it would pass away
from Him, and afterwards from the whole race of mankind also; if He
should not drink it, it would perhaps pass from Him, but from men it
would not pass. He would fain therefore that it should so pass from Him
as that He should not at all taste its bitterness, yet only if it were
possible, saving the righteousness of God. If it were not possible, He
was rather willing to drink it, that so it might pass from Him, and
from the whole race of mankind rather than against His Father's will
shun the drinking thereof.
That He prays for this a second and a third time, comes of the feelings
belonging to human frailty, through which also He feared death, thus
giving assurance that He was truly made man. For in Scripture when any
thing is repeated a second and third time, that is the greatest proof
of its truth and reality; as, for example, when Joseph says to Pharaoh,
And for that you saw it twice, it is proof of the thing being
established by God.
JEROME; Or otherwise; He prays a second time that if Nineveh, or the
Gentile world, cannot be saved unless the gourd, i.e. the Jews, be
withered, His Father's will may be done, which is not contrary to the
Son's will, who Himself speaks by the Prophet, I am content to do your
will, O God.
HILARY; Otherwise, He bare in His own body all the infirmities of us
His disciples who should suffer, and nailed to His cross all wherein we
are distressed; and therefore that cup cannot pass from Him, unless He
drink it, because we cannot suffer, except by His passion.
Christ singly prays for all, as He singly suffers for all. Their eyes
were heavy, i.e. an oppression and stupefaction came on as their denial
drew near.
ORIGEN; And I suppose that the eyes of their body were not so much
affected as the eyes of their mind, because the Spirit was not yet
given them Wherefore He does not rebuke them, but goes again and prays,
teaching us that we should not faint but should persevere in prayer,
until we obtain what we have begun to ask.
He prayed the third time, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word might be established.
RABAN. Or, The Lord prayed thrice, to teach us to pray for pardon of
sins past, defense against present evil, and provision against future
perils, and that we should address every prayer to Father, Son, and
Holy Spirit, and that our spirit' soul, and body should be kept in
safety.
AUG. Nor is that an absurd interpretation which makes Our Lord play
thrice because of the threefold temptation of His Passion. To the
temptation of curiosity is opposed the fear of death; for as the one is
a yearning for the knowledge of things, so the other is the fear of
losing such knowledge. To the desire of honor or applause is opposed
the dread of disgrace and insult. To the desire of pleasure is opposed
the fear of pain.
REMIG. Or, He prays thrice for the Apostles, and for Peter in particular, who was to deny Him thrice.
45. Then come he to his disciples, and says to them, Sleep on
now, and take your rest: behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of
man is betrayed into the hands of sinners.
46. Rise, let us be going: behold, he is at hand that does betray me.
HILARY; After His persevering prayer, after His departures and several
returns, He takes away their fear, restores their confidence, and
exhorts them to sleep on, and take their rest.
CHRYS. Indeed it fit them then to watch, but He said this to show that
the prospect of coming evils was more than they would bear, that He had
no need of their aid, and that it must needs be that He should be
delivered up.
HILARY; Or, He bids them sleep on, and take their rest, because He now
confidently awaited His Father's will concerning the disciples,
concerning which He had said, Your will be done, and in obedience to
which He drunk the cup that was to pass from Him to us, diverting upon
Himself the weakness of our body, the terrors of dismay, and even the
pains of death itself.
ORIGEN; Or, the sleep He now bids His disciples take is of a different
sort from that which is related above to have befallen them. Then He
found them sleeping, not taking repose, but because their eyes were
heavy, but now they are not merely to sleep, but to take their rest,
that this order may be rightly observed, namely, that we first watch
with prayer that we enter not into temptation, and afterwards sleep and
take our rest, when having found a place for the Lord, a tabernacle for
the God of Jacob, we may go up into our bed, and give sleep to our
eyes. It may be also that the soul, unable to sustain a continual
energy by reason of its union with the flesh, may blamelessly admit
some relaxation, which may be the moral interpretation of slumbers, and
then again after due time be quickened to new energy.
HILARY; And whereas, when He returned and found them sleeping, He
rebukes them the first time, the second time says nothing, the third
time bids them take their rest; the interpretation of this is, that at
the first after His resurrection, when He finds them dispersed,
distrustful, and timorous, He rebukes them; the second time, when their
eyes were heavy to look upon the liberty of the Gospel, He visited
them, sending them the Spirit, the Paraclete; for, held back by
attachment to the Law, they slumbered in respect of faith; but the
third time, when He shall come in His glory, He shall restore them to
quietness and confidence.
ORIGEN; When He had roused them from sleep, seeing in the Spirit Judas
drawing near to betray Him, though the disciples could not yet see him,
He says, Behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man is betrayed
into the hands of sinners.
CHRYS. The words, the hour is at hand, point out that all that has been
done was by Divine interference; and that, into the hands of sinners,
show that this was the work of their wickedness, not that He was guilty
of any crime.
ORIGEN; And even now Jesus is betrayed into the hands of sinners, when
those who seem to believe in Jesus, continue to sin while they have Him
in their hands. Also whenever a righteous man, who has Jesus in Him, is
put into the power of sinners, Jesus is delivered into the hands of
sinners.
JEROME; Having concluded His third prayer, and having obtained that the
Apostles' terror should be corrected by subsequent penitence, He goes
forth undaunted by the prospect of His own Passion to meet His
pursuers, and offers Himself voluntarily to be sacrificed. Arise, let
us be going; as much as to say, Let them not find you trembling, let us
go forth willingly to death, that they may see us confident and
rejoicing in suffering; Lo, he that shall betray me draws near.
ORIGEN; He says not, Draws near to you, for indeed the traitor was not
near Him, but had removed himself far off through his sins.
AUG. This speech as Matthew has it seems self-contradictory. For how
could He say, Sleep on, and take your rest, and immediately continue,
Rise, let us be going. This contradiction some have endeavored to
reconcile by supposing the words, Sleep on, and take your rest, to be
an ironical rebuke, and not a permission; it might be rightly so taken
if need were. But as Mark records it, when He had said, Sleep on, and
take your rest, He added, it is enough, and then continued, The hour is
come, behold, the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners; we
clearly understand the Lord to have been silent some time after He had
said, Sleep on, to allow of their doing so, and then after some
interval to have roused them with, Behold, the hour is at hand. And as
Mark fills up the sense with, it is enough, that is, you have had rest
enough.
47. And while he yet spoke, lo, Judas, one of the twelve, came,
and with him a great multitude with swords and staves, from the Chief
Priests and elders of the people.
48. Now he that betrayed him gave them a sign, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he: hold him fast.
49. And forthwith he came to Jesus, and said, Hail, Master; and kissed him.
50. And Jesus said to him, Friend, wherefore are you come? Then came they, and laid hands on Jesus, and took him.
GLOSS. Having said above that the Lord offered Himself of His own
accord to His pursuers, the Evangelist proceeds to relate how He was
seized by them.
REMIG. One of the twelve, by association of name, not of desert. This
shows the monstrous wickedness of the man who from the dignity of the
Apostleship became the traitor. To show that it was out of envy that
they seized Him, it is added, A great multitude sent by the Chief
Priests and elders of the people.
ORIGEN; Some may say that a great multitude came, because of the great
multitude of those who already believed, who, they feared, might rescue
Him out of their hands; but I think there is another reason for this,
and that is, that they who thought that He cast out demons through
Beelzebub, supposed that by some magic He might escape the hands of
those who sought to hold Him. Even now do many fight against Jesus with
spiritual weapons, to wit, with divers and shifting dogmas concerning
God. It deserves inquiry why, when He was as known by face to all who
dwelt in Judea, he should have given them a sign, as though they were
unacquainted with His person. But a tradition to this effect has come
down to us, that not only had He two different forms, one under which
He appeared to men, the other into which He was transfigured before His
disciples in the mount, but also that He appeared to each man in such
degree as the beholder was worthy; in like manner as we read of the
manna, that it had a flavor adapted to every variety of use, and as the
word of God shows not alike to all. They required therefore a sign by
reason of this His transfiguration.
CHRYS. Or, because whenever they had hither attempted to seize Him, He
had escaped them they knew not how; as also He might then have done had
He been so minded.
RABAN. The Lord suffered the traitor's kiss, not to teach us to
dissemble, but that He might not seem to shrink from His betrayal.
ORIGEN; If it be asked why Judas betrayed Jesus with a kiss, according
to some it was because He desired to keep up the reverence due to his
Master, and did not dare to make an open assault upon Him; according to
others, it was out of fear that if he came as an avowed enemy, he might
be the cause of His escape, which he believed Jesus had it in His power
to effect. But I think that all betrayers of truth love to assume the
guise of truth, and to use the sign of a kiss. Like Judas also, all
heretics call Jesus Rabbi, and receive from Him mild answer. And Jesus
said to him, Friend, wherefore are you come? He says, Friend,
upbraiding his hypocrisy; for in Scripture we never find this term of
address used to any of the good, but as above, Friend, how came you in
hither? and, Friend, I do you no wrong.
AUG. He says, Wherefore are you come? as much as to say, Your kiss is a
snare for Me; I know wherefore you are come; you feign yourself My
friend; being indeed My betrayer.
REMIG. Or, after Friend, for what you are come, that do, is understood.
Then came they, and laid their hands on Jesus, and held him. Then, that
is, when He suffered them, for often times they would have done it, but
were not able.
PSEUDO-AUG. Exult, Christian, you have gained by this bargain of your
enemies; what; Judas sold, and what the Jews bought, belongs to you.
51. And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out
his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the High
Priest's, and smote off his ear.
52. Then said Jesus to him, Put up again your sword into his place: for
all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.
53. Think you that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
54. But how then shall the Scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?
CHRYS. So Luke relates, the Lord had said to His disciples at supper,
He that has a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip; and he
that has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one; and the
disciples answered, Lo, here are two swords. It was natural that there
should be swords there for the paschal lamb which they had been eating.
Hearing then that the pursuers were coming to apprehend Christ, when
they went out from supper they took these swords, as though to fight in
defense of their Master against His pursuers.
JEROME; In another Gospel, Peter is represented as having done this,
and with his usual hastiness; and that the servant's ant's name was
Malchus, and that the ear was the right ear. In passing we may say,
that Malchus, i.e. one who should have been king of the Jews, was made
the slave of the ungodliness and the greediness of the Priests, and
lost his right ear so that he might hear only the worthlessness of the
letter in his left.
ORIGEN; For though they seem even now to hear the Law, yet is it only
with the left ear that they hear the shadow of a tradition concerning
the Law, and not the truth. The people of the Gentiles is signified by
Peter; for by believing in Christ, they become the cause of cutting off
the Jews' right ear.
RABAN. Or, Peter does not take away the sense of understanding from
them that hear, but opens to the careless that which by a divine
sentence was taken away from them; but this same right ear is restored
to its original function in those who out of this nation believed.
HILARY; Otherwise; The ear of the High Priest's servant is cut off by
the Apostle, that is, Christ's disciple cuts off the disobedient
healing of a people which w were the slaves of the Priesthood, the ear
which had refused to hear is cut off so that it is no longer capable of
hearing.
LEO; The Lord of the zealous Apostle will not suffer his pious feeling
to proceed further, Then says Jesus to him, Put up again your sword
into his place. For it was contrary to the sacrament of our redemption
that He, who had come to die for all, should refuse to be apprehended.
He gives therefore license to their fury against Him, lest by putting
off the triumph of His glorious Cross, the dominion of the Devil should
be made longer, and the captivity of men more enduring.
RABAN. It was necessary also that the Author of grace should teach the
faithful patience by His own example, and should rather train them to
endure adversity with fortitude, than incite them to self-defense.
CHRYS. To move the disciple to this, He adds a threat, saying, All them that take the sword, shall perish by the sword.
AUG. That is, every one who uses the sword. And he uses the sword ,
who, without the command or sanction of any superior, or legitimate
authority, arms himself against man's life. For truly the Lord had
given commandment to His disciples to take the sword, but not to smite
with the sword. Was it then at all unbecoming that Peter after this sin
should become ruler of the Church, as Moses after smiting the Egyptian
was made ruler and chief of the Synagogue? For both transgressed the
rule not through hardened ferocity, but through a warmth of spirit
capable of good; both through hatred of the injustice of others; both
sinned through love, the one for his brother, the other for his Lord,
though a carnal love.
HILARY; But all who use the sword do not perish by the sword; of those
who have used the sword either judicially, or in self-defense against
robbers, fever or accident carries off the greater part. Though if
according to this every one who uses the sword shall perish by the
sword, justly was the sword now drawn against those who were using the
same for the promotion of crime.
JEROME; With what sword then shall he perish, that takes the sword? By
that fiery sword which waves before the gate of paradise, and that
sword of the Spirit which is described in the armor of God.
HILARY; The Lord then bids him return his sword into its sheath,
because He would destroy them by no weapon of man, but by the sword, of
His mouth.
REMIG. Otherwise; Every one who uses the sword to put man to death perishes first by the sword of his own wickedness.
CHRYS. He not only soothed His disciples, by this declaration of
punishment against His enemies, but convinced them that it was
voluntarily that He suffered, Think you that I cannot pray to my
Father, &c. Because He had shown many qualities of human infirmity,
He would have seemed to say what was incredible, if He had said that He
had power to destroy them, therefore He says, Think you that I cannot
now pray to my Father?
JEROME; That is to say, I need not the aid of the Apostles, though all
the twelve should fight for me, seeing I could have twelve legions of
the Angelic army. The complement of a legion among the ancients was six
thousand men; twelve legions then are seventy-two thousand Angels,
being as many as the divisions of the human race and language.
ORIGEN; This shows that the armies of heaven have divisions into
legions like earthly armies, in the warfare of the Angels against the
legions of the demons. This He said not as though He needed the aid of
the Angels, but speaking in accordance with the supposition of Peter,
who sought to give Him assistance. Truly the Angels have more need of
the help of the Only-begotten Son of God, than He of theirs.
REMIG. We might also understand by the Angels the Roman armies, for
with Titus and Vespasian all languages had risen, against Judea, and
that was fulfilled, The whole world shall fight for him against those
foolish men.
CHRYS. And He quiets their fears not thus only, but by reference to
Scripture, How then shall the Scriptures be fulfilled that thus it must
be?
JEROME; This speech shows a mind willing to suffer; vainly would the
Prophets have prophesied truly, unless the Lord asserts their truth by
His suffering.
55. In that same hour said Jesus to the multitudes, Are you come
out as against a thief with swords and staves for to take me? I sat
daily with you in the temple, and you laid no hold on me.
56. But all this was done, that the Scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled. Then all the disciples forsook him, and fled.
57. And they that had laid hold on Jesus led him away to Caiaphas the
High Priest, where the Scribes and the elders were assembled.
58. But Peter followed him afar off to the High Priest's palace, and went in, and sat with the servants, to see the end.
ORIGEN; Having commanded Peter to put up his sword, which was an
instance of patience, and having (as another Evangelist writes) healed
the ear that was cut off, which was an instance of the greatest mercy,
and of Divine power, it now follows, In that hour said Jesus to the
multitudes, (to the end that if they could not remember His past
goodness, they might at least confess His present,) Are you come out as
against a thief with swords and staves for to take me?
REMIG. As much as to say, Robbers assault and study concealment; I have
injured no one, but have healed many, and have ever taught in your
synagogues.
JEROME; It is folly then to seek with swords and staves Him who offers
Himself to your hands, and with a traitor to hunt out, as though
lurking under cover of night, one who is daily teaching in the temple.
CHRYS. They did not lay hands on Him in the temple because they feared
the multitude, therefore also the Lord went forth that He might give
them place and opportunity to take Him. This then teaches them, that if
He had not suffered them of His own free choice, they would never have
had strength to take Him. Then the Evangelist assigns the reason why
the Lord was willing to be taken, adding, All this was done that the
Scriptures of the Prophets might be fulfilled.
JEROME; They pierced my hands and my feet; and in another place, He is
led as a sheep to the slaughter; and, By the iniquities of my people
was He led to death.
REMIG. For because all the Prophets had foretold Christ's Passion, he
does not cite any particular place, but says generally that the
prophecies of all the Prophets were being fulfilled.
CHRYS The disciples who had remained when the Lord was apprehended,
fled when He spoke these things to the multitudes, Then all the
disciples forsook Him and fled; for they then understood that He could
not escape but rather gave Himself up voluntarily.
REMIG. In this act is shown the Apostles' frailty; in the first ardor
of their faith they had promised to die with Him, but in their fear
they forgot their promise and fled. The same we may see in those who
undertake to do great things for the love of God, but fail to fulfill
what they undertake; they ought not to despair, but to rise again with
the Apostles, and recover themselves by penitence.
RABAN. Mystically, As Peter, who by tears washed away, the sin of his
denial, figures the recovery of those who lapse in time of martyrdom;
so the flight of the other disciples suggests the precaution of flight
to such as feel themselves unfit to endure torments.
AUG. They that had laid hold on Jesus led Him away to Caiaphas the High
Priest. But He was first taken to Annas, father-in-law to Caiaphas, as
John relates. And He was taken bound, there being with that multitude a
tribune and cohort as John also records.
JEROME; But Josephus writes, that this Caiaphas had purchased the
priesthood of a single year, notwithstanding that Moses, at God's
command, had directed that High Priests should succeed hereditarily,
and that in the Priests likewise succession by birth should be followed
up. No wonder then that an unrighteous High Priest should judge
unrighteously.
RABAN. And the action suits his name; Caiaphas, i.e. 'contriving,' or,
'politic,' to execute his villainy; or 'vomiting from his mouth,'
because of his audacity in uttering a lie, and bringing about the
murder. They took Jesus thither, that they might do all advisedly; as
it follows, Where the Scribes and the Elders were assembled.
ORIGEN; Where Caiaphas the High Priest is, there are assembled the
Scribes, that is, the men of the letter, who preside over the letter
that kills; and Elders, not in truth, but in the obsolete ancientness
of the letter. It follows, Peter followed Him afar off, He would
neither keep close to Him, nor altogether leave Him, but followed afar
off.
CHRYS. Great was the zeal of Peter, who fled not when He saw the others
fly, but remained, and entered in. For though John also went in, yet he
was known to the Chief Priest. He followed afar off, because he was
about to deny his Lord.
REMIG. For had he kept close to his Lord's side, he could never have
denied Him. This also shows that Peter should follow his Lord's
Passion, that is, imitate it.
AUG. And also that the Church should follow, i.e. imitate, the Lord's
Passion, but with great difference. For the Church suffers for itself,
but Christ for the Church.
JEROME; He went in, either out of the attachment of a disciple, or
natural curiosity, seeking to know what sentence the High Priest would
pass, whether death, or scourging.
59. Now the Chief Priests, and elders, and all the council, sought false witness against Jesus, to put him to death;
60. But found none: yes, though many false witnesses came, yet found they none. At the last came two false witnesses,
61. And said, This fellow said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days.
62. And the High Priest arose, and said to him, Answer you nothing? what is it which these witness against you?
63. But Jesus held his peace. And the High Priest answered and said to
him, I adjure you by the living God, that you tell us whether you be
the Christ, the Son of God.
64. Jesus said to him, You have said: nevertheless I say to you,
Hereafter shall you see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of
power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
65. Then the High Priest rent his clothes, saying, He has spoken
blasphemy; what further need have we of witnesses? behold, now you have
heard his blasphemy.
66. What think you? They answered and said, He is guilty of death.
67. Then did they spit in his face, and buffeted him; and others smote him with the palms of their hands,
68. Saying, Prophesy to us, you Christ, Who is he that smote you?
When the Chief Priests were thus assembled, this conventicle of
ruffians sought to give their conspiracy the character of a legal
trial. But it was entirely a scene of confusion and uproar, as what
follows shows, Though many false witnesses came, yet found they none.
False witnesses have place when there is any good color for their
testimony. But no pretext was found which could further their
falsehoods against Jesus; notwithstanding there were many desirous to
do a favor to the Chief Priests. This then is a great testimony in
favor of Jesus, that He had lived and taught so irreproachably, that
though they were many, and crafty, and wicked, they could find no
semblance of fault in Him.
At last came two false witnesses. How are they false witnesses, when
they repeat only what we read that the Lord spoke? A false witness is
one who takes what is said in a different sense from that in which it
was said. Now this the Lord had spoken of the temple of His Body, and
they cavil at His expressions, and by a slight change and addition
produce a plausible charge. The Lord's words were, Destroy this temple;
this they make into, I can destroy the Temple of God. He said, Destroy
not 'I will destroy,' because it is unlawful to lay hands on ourselves.
Also they phrased it, And build it again, making it apply to the temple
of the Jews; but the Lord had said, And I will raise it up again, thus
clearly pointing out a living and breathing temple. For to build again,
and to raise again, are two different things.
CHRYS. Why did they not bring forward now His breaking the Sabbath? Because He had so often confuted them on this point.
Headlong and uncontrolled rage, unable to find even a false accusation,
moves the High Priest from his throne, the motion of his body showing
the emotion of his mind. And the High Priest arose, and said to him,
Answer you nothing to the things which these witness against You?
He said this with a design to draw from Him some indefensible answer
which might be made a snare for Him. But Jesus held his peace, for
defense had availed nothing when none would listen to it. For here was
only a mockery of justice, it was in truth nothing more than the
anarchy of a den of robbers.
ORIGEN; This place teaches us to contemn the clamors of slanderers and
false witnesses, and not to consider those who speak unbeseeming things
of us worthy of an answer; but then, above all, when it is greater to
be manfully and resolutely silent, than to plead our cause in vain.
JEROME; For as God, He knew that whatever He said would be twisted into
an accusation against Him. But at this His silence before false
witnesses and ungodly Priests, the High Priest was exasperated, and
summons Him to answer, that from any thing He says he may raise a
charge against Him.
Under the Law, we do indeed find many instances of this adjuration; but
I judge that a man who would live according to the Gospel should not
adjure another; for if we are not permitted to swear, surely not to
adjure. But he that regards Jesus commanding the demons, and giving His
disciples power over them, will say, that to address the demons by the
power given by the Savior, is not to adjure them. But the High Priest
did sin in laying a snare for Jesus; imitating his father, who twice
asked the Savior, If you be Christ the Son of God. Hence one might
rightly say, that to doubt concerning the Son of God, whether Christ be
He, is the work of the Devil. It was not fit that the Lord should
answer the High Priest's adjuration as though under compulsion,
wherefore He neither denied nor confessed Himself to be the Son of God.
For he was not worthy to be the object of Christ's teaching, therefore
He does not instruct him, but taking up his own words retorts them upon
him. This sitting of the Son of Man seems to me to denote a certain
regal security; by the power of God, Who is the only power, is He
securely seated to Whom is given by His Father all power in heaven as
in earth. And there will come a time when the enemies shall see this
establishment. Indeed this has begun to be fulfilled from the earliest
time of the dispensation; for the disciples saw Him rising from the
dead, and thereby saw Him seated on the right hand of power. Or, In
respect of that eternity of duration which is with God, from the
beginning of the world to the end of it is but one day; it is therefore
no wonder that the Savior here says, Shortly, signifying that there is
but short time before the end come. He prophesies moreover, that they
should not only see Him sitting at the right hand of power, but also
coming in the clouds of heaven. These clouds are the Prophets and
Apostles, whom He commands to rain when it is required, they are the
clouds that pass not away, but bearing the image of the heavenly, are
worthy to he the throne of God, as heirs of God, and joint-heirs with
Christ.
The same fury which drew the High Priest from his seat, impels him now
to rend his clothes; for so it was customary with the Jews to do
whenever they heard any blasphemy, or any thing against God.
CHRYS. This He did to give weight to the accusation, and to confirm by deeds what He taught in words.
JEROME; And by this rending his garments, he shows that the Jews have
lost the priestly glory, and that their High Priest's throne was
vacant. For by rending his garment he rent the veil of the Law which
covered him.
Then, after rending his garment, he did not give sentence of himself;
but asked of others, saying, What think you? As was always done in
undeniable cases of sin, and manifest blasphemy, and as by force
driving them to a certain opinion, he anticipates the answer, What need
we any further witnesses? Behold, now you have heard his blasphemy.
What was this blasphemy? For before He had interpreted to them as they
were gathered together that text, The Lord said to my Lord, Sit you on
my right hand, and they had held their peace, and had not contradicted
Him. How then do they call what He now says blasphemy? They answered
and said, He is guilty of death, the same persons, at once accusers,
examiners, and sentencers.
ORIGEN; How great their error! to pronounce the principle of all men's
life to be guilty of death, and not to acknowledge by the testimony of
the resurrection of so many, the Fount of life, from Whom life flows to
all that rise again.
CHRYS. As hunters who have started their game, so they exhibit a wild and drunken exultation.
They spit in his face, and buffeted him, to fulfill the prophecy of
Esaias, I gave my cheek to the smiters, and turned not away my face
from shame and spitting.
Prophesy to us; is said in ridicule of His claim to be held as a Prophet by the people.
JEROME; But it would have been foolish to have answered them that smote
Him, and to have declared the smiter, seeing that in their madness they
seem to have struck; Him openly.
CHRYS. Observe how circumstantially the Evangelist recounts all those
particulars even which seem most disgraceful, hiding or extenuating
nothing, but thinking it the highest glory that the Lord of the earth
should endure such things for us. This let us read continually, let us
imprint in our minds, and in these things let us boast.
AUG. That, they did spit in his face, signifies those who reject His
proffered grace. They likewise buffet Him who prefer their own honor to
Him; and they smite Him on the face, who, blinded with unbelief, affirm
that He is not yet come, disowning and rejecting His person.
69. Now Peter sat without in the palace: and a damsel came to him, saying, You also were with Jesus of Galilee.
70. But he denied before them all, saying, I know not what you say.
71. And when he was gone out into the porch, another maid saw him, and
said to them that were there, This fellow was also with Jesus of
Nazareth.
72. And again he denied with an oath, I do not know the man.
73. And after a while came to him they that stood by, and said to
Peter, Surely you also are one of them; for your speech betrays you.
74. Then began he to curse and to swear, saying, I know not the man. And immediately the cock crew.
75. And Peter remembered the word of Jesus, which said to him, Before
the cock crow, you shall deny me thrice. And he went out, and wept
bitterly.
Among the other insults offered to our Lord was the threefold denial of
Peter, which the several Evangelists relate in different order. Luke
puts Peter's trial first, and the ill-usage of the Lord after that;
Matthew and Mark reverse the order.
JEROME; Peter sat without, that he might see the event, and not excite suspicion by any approach to Jesus.
And he, who, when he saw his Master laid hands on, drew his sword and
cut off the ear, now when he sees Him enduring such insults becomes a
denier, and cannot withstand the taunts of a mean servant girl. A
damsel came to him, saying, You also were with Jesus of Galilee.
RABAN. What means this, that a handmaid is the first to tax him, when
men would be more likely to recognize him, except that this sex might
seem to sin somewhat in the Lord's death, that they might be redeemed
by His passion? He denied before them all, because he was afraid to
reveal himself; that he said, I know not, shows that he was not yet
willing to die for the Savior. LEO, For this reason it should seem he
was permitted to waver, that the remedy of penitence might be exhibited
in the head of the Church, and that none should dare to trust in his
own strength, when even the blessed Peter could not escape the danger
of frailty.
But not once, but twice and thrice did he deny within a short time.
AUG. We understand that having gone out after his first denial, the cock crowed the first time as Mark relates.
CHRYS. To show that the sound did not keep him from denial, nor bring his promise to mind.
AUG. The second denial was not outside the door, but after he had
returned to the fire; for the secon |